Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38494906›Full record

ArticleClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

Use of Andexanet Alfa for Factor Xa Inhibitor Reversal in US Verified Trauma Centers: A National Survey.

Charles Fasanya, Abenámar Arrillaga, Catherine Caronia, Lauren Rothburd, Tenzing Japhe, Younghee Hahn, Paul Joseph, Dajana Reci, Patricia Eckardt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Charles FasanyaDepartment of Trauma Surgery/Critical Care, Good Samaritan University Hospital, West Islip, New York, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-7421-9126
Abenámar ArrillagaDepartment of Trauma Surgery/Critical Care, Good Samaritan University Hospital, West Islip, New York, USA.
Catherine CaroniaDepartment of Pediatrics, Graduate Medical Education, Good Samaritan University Hospital, West Islip, New York, USA.
Lauren RothburdTrauma Services, Good Samaritan University Hospital, West Islip, New York, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-2046-0683
Tenzing JapheDepartment of Surgery, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Glen Head, New York, USA.
Younghee HahnDepartment of Surgery, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Glen Head, New York, USA.
Paul JosephDepartment of Surgery, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Glen Head, New York, USA.
Dajana ReciDepartment of Surgery, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Glen Head, New York, USA.
Patricia EckardtTrauma Services, Nursing Administration, Good Samaritan University Hospital, West Islip, New York, USA.
Good Samaritan University Hospital · USNew York Institute of Technology · USMolloy College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct oral factor Xa inhibitors are replacing vitamin K-dependent antagonists as anticoagulation treatment in many clinical scenarios. Trauma centers are noting an increase in patients presenting on these medications. The 2018 Food and Drug Administration approval of andexanet alfa provides an alternative anticoagulation reversal. Barriers may limit utilization of new medications including a lack of grade 1A evidence supporting the use of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) versus andexanet alfa and cost. To evaluate barriers of andexanet alfa utilization by trauma surgeons, a 15-question survey was conducted. There was a 9% completion rate (n = 89). The results revealed 23.5% would choose andexanet alfa as first-line treatment in children, and 25.8% as first-line treatment in adults. The majority of respondents, 64.7% and 67.4%, would use PCC preferentially in children and adults, respectively. Respondents indicated that cost burden was an overriding factor (76.3%); 42.4% cited lack of high-level efficacy data of andexanet alfa for reversal of factor Xa inhibitors. Additional double-blinded multi-institutional randomized controlled trials comparing 4F-PCC and andexanet alfa for factor Xa inhibitor reversal are needed to support efficacy especially with the increased cost associated.

Indexed as

Factor XaFactor Xa InhibitorsAdultAnticoagulantsAntithrombin IIIChildFactor IXFibrinolytic AgentsHumansRecombinant ProteinsAnticoagulantsAntithrombin IIIFactor IXFactor XaFactor Xa InhibitorsFibrinolytic AgentsPRT064445Recombinant Proteinsandexanet alfaDOAC reversalsurveytrauma surgeons

Identifiers

PMID38494906
PMCPMC10946067
OpenAlexW4392919817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.