Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38494702›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2025

Automated Detection of Cerebral Microbleeds on Two-dimensional Gradient-recalled Echo T2* Weighted Images Using a Morphology Filter Bank and Convolutional Neural Network.

Noriko Nishioka, Yukie Shimizu, Toru Shirai, Hisaaki Ochi, Yoshitaka Bito, Kiichi Watanabe, Hiroyuki Kameda, Taisuke Harada, Kohsuke Kudo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Noriko NishiokaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Yukie ShimizuDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Toru ShiraiMedical Systems Research & Development Center, FUJIFILM Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Hisaaki OchiMedical Systems Research & Development Center, FUJIFILM Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshitaka BitoFUJIFILM Healthcare Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Kiichi WatanabeDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Hiroyuki KamedaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Taisuke HaradaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Kohsuke KudoDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Hokkaido University Hospital · JPFujifilm (Japan) · JPHokkaido University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe present a novel algorithm for the automated detection of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) on 2D gradient-recalled echo T2* weighted images (T2*WIs). This approach combines a morphology filter bank with a convolutional neural network (CNN) to improve the efficiency of CMB detection. A technical evaluation was performed to ascertain the algorithm's accuracy.

methodsIn this retrospective study, 60 patients with CMBs on T2*WIs were included. The gold standard was set by three neuroradiologists based on the Microbleed Anatomic Rating Scale guidelines. Images with CMBs were extracted from the training dataset comprising 30 cases using a morphology filter bank, and false positives (FPs) were removed based on the threshold of size and signal intensity. The extracted images were used to train the CNN (Vgg16). To determine the effectiveness of the morphology filter bank, the outcomes of the following two methods for detecting CMBs from the 30-case test dataset were compared: (a) employing the morphology filter bank and additional FP removal and (b) comprehensive detection without filters. The trained CNN processed both sets of initial CMB candidates, and the final CMB candidates were compared with the gold standard. The sensitivity and FPs per patient of both methods were compared.

resultsAfter CNN processing, the morphology-filter-bank-based method had a 95.0% sensitivity with 4.37 FPs per patient. In contrast, the comprehensive method had a 97.5% sensitivity with 25.87 FPs per patient.

conclusionThrough effective CMB candidate refinement with a morphology filter bank and FP removal with a CNN, we achieved a high CMB detection rate and low FP count. Combining a CNN and morphology filter bank may facilitate the accurate automated detection of CMBs on T2*WIs.

Indexed as

Cerebral HemorrhageImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsBrainConvolutional Neural NetworksFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiescerebral microbleedconvolutional neural networkmorphology filter bank

Identifiers

PMID38494702
PMCPMC11996243
OpenAlexW4392792157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.