ArticleDevelopmental medicine and child neurology2024
Contextual predictors of self-management and independence trajectories in adolescents and young adults with spina bifida.
Article in Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Self-management in youth with spina bifida: predictors of health and quality of life outcomes.Disability and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Healthcare Self-Management, Executive Functioning, and Social Determinants of Health in Young Adults with Pediatric-Onset Disabilities: a Pilot Study.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo examine socioeconomic, condition-related, and neuropsychological predictors of self-management trajectories in adolescents and young adults with spina bifida.
methodIn this longitudinal study, participants completed the Adolescent/Young Adult Self-Management and Independence Scale interview. Socioeconomic status (SES), shunt status, lesion level, and executive functioning were assessed. Growth in self-management was estimated using linear mixed-effects models.
resultsParticipants (n = 99) were aged 18 to 27 years. Approximately half (52.5%) were female and White; 15.2% were Black; and 32.3% Hispanic or Latino. Although none of the predictors were associated with growth in self-management from ages 18 to 27 years (p > 0.05), several factors were associated with the intercept at age 18 years for total self-management. Higher SES at baseline predicted a higher total self-management score at age 18 years (b = 0.03, standard error [SE] = 0.01; p < 0.001). On average, participants at age 18 years with a shunt scored lower than those without a shunt (b = -0.90, SE = 0.32; p = 0.01); those with a thoracic lesion scored lower than those with lower lesion levels (lumbar: b = -1.22, SE = 0.34; sacral: b = -1.20, SE = 0.36; p = 0.001 for both). Better parent-reported and teacher-reported executive functions predicted higher total self-management (metacognitive: b = -0.03, SE = 0.01; behavioral regulation: b = -0.04, SE = 0.01; p < 0.05 for both).
interpretationOn average, all participants improved in self-management over time. Additionally, baseline superiority in self-management for adolescents and young adults without a shunt, less severe lesions, better executive functions, and higher SES persisted over time. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Higher socioeconomic status at baseline predicted higher self-management scores at age 18 years. Participants with a shunt scored lower than those without a shunt. Participants with a thoracic lesion scored lower than those with other, less severe lesions. Better parent-reported and teacher-reported executive functions predicted higher self-management scores at age 18 years. Growth in self-management was not moderated by socioeconomic, condition-related, or neuropsychological variables.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.