ArticleScientific reports2024
Defense against adversarial attacks: robust and efficient compressed optimized neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- When collaboration fails: persuasion driven adversarial influence in multi agent large language model debate.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Robust Histopathology Subtyping via Perturbation Fidelity in Deep Classifier.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Regulation of clinical Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Age of Agents: Unconfined Non-Deterministic Clinical Software (UNDCS) systems for healthcare.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Defending against and generating adversarial examples together with generative adversarial networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Efficient self-attention with smart pruning for sustainable large language models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Optimizing cryptographic protocols against side channel attacks using WGAN-GP and genetic algorithms.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the ongoing battle against adversarial attacks, adopting a suitable strategy to enhance model efficiency, bolster resistance to adversarial threats, and ensure practical deployment is crucial. To achieve this goal, a novel four-component methodology is introduced. First, introducing a pioneering batch-cumulative approach, the exponential particle swarm optimization (ExPSO) algorithm was developed for meticulous parameter fine-tuning within each batch. A cumulative updating loss function was employed for overall optimization, demonstrating remarkable superiority over traditional optimization techniques. Second, weight compression is applied to streamline the deep neural network (DNN) parameters, boosting the storage efficiency and accelerating inference. It also introduces complexity to deter potential attackers, enhancing model accuracy in adversarial settings. This study compresses the generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) by 65%, saving time and memory without causing performance loss. Compared to state-of-the-art methods, the proposed method achieves the lowest perplexity (14.28), the highest accuracy (93.72%), and an 8 × speedup in the central processing unit. The integration of the preceding two components involves the simultaneous training of multiple versions of the compressed GPT. This training occurs across various compression rates and different segments of a dataset and is ultimately associated with a novel multi-expert architecture. This enhancement significantly fortifies the model's resistance to adversarial attacks by introducing complexity into attackers' attempts to anticipate the model's prediction integration process. Consequently, this leads to a remarkable average performance improvement of 25% across 14 different attack scenarios and various datasets, surpassing the capabilities of current state-of-the-art methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.