Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38494518›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Understanding the consumer-citizen gap in Chinese public attitudes toward farm animal welfare.

Bing Jiang, Lihang Cui, Xiaoshang Deng, Hongbo Chen, Wenjie Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Development of a Tool to Detect Open-Mouthed Respiration in Caged Broilers.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bing JiangCollege of Economics and Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Changjiang Street 600#, Xiangfang District, Harbin, 150030, Heilongjiang, China.
Lihang CuiCollege of Economics and Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Changjiang Street 600#, Xiangfang District, Harbin, 150030, Heilongjiang, China. b210801002@neau.edu.cn.ORCID 0009-0000-0050-0812
Xiaoshang DengCollege of Economics and Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Changjiang Street 600#, Xiangfang District, Harbin, 150030, Heilongjiang, China.
Hongbo ChenCollege of Economics and Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Changjiang Street 600#, Xiangfang District, Harbin, 150030, Heilongjiang, China.
Wenjie TangCollege of Economics and Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Changjiang Street 600#, Xiangfang District, Harbin, 150030, Heilongjiang, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 71640017Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province LH2021G002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals of the general public can perform both consumer and citizen roles in farm animal welfare, and attitudes toward farm animal welfare may differ between these roles. However, scant research is available regarding this distinction, especially in developing countries such as China. The present study aimed to explore consumer-citizen gaps in Chinese public attitudes toward farm animal welfare across three dimensions and across demographic characteristics. A 36-item scale was designed, and completed by 5284 Chinese participants in a large-scale cross-sectional survey. Consumer-citizen gaps in attitudes toward farm animal welfare across three dimensions and demographic characteristics were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and effects of demographic characteristics on attitudes were further explored by linear regression analysis. A significant consumer-citizen gap was found in overall attitudes, although the consumer role was only slightly more positive than the citizen role. The consumer-citizen gap is driven by differences in both cognitive attitudes and behavioral attitudes. The gap is most pronounced in cognitive attitudes, where the consumer role is significantly more positive, and smaller in behavioral attitudes, where the citizen role is significantly more positive. The consumer-citizen gap varies significantly among different demographic groups, including gender, age, education, monthly household income, area of residence, and occupation. Additionally, education, monthly household income, and area of residence have significant effects on attitudes in the dual role, whereas gender only affect consumer-role attitudes significantly. The findings provide evidence that consumer-citizen gaps in Chinese public attitudes toward farm animal welfare exist, and this distinction is mainly determined by demographic characteristics.

Indexed as

Animals, DomesticPublic OpinionAnimalsAnimal WelfareAttitudeCross-Sectional StudiesFarmsHumansChineseCitizenConsumerConsumer-citizen gapsFarm animal welfarePublic attitudes

Identifiers

PMID38494518
PMCPMC10944836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.