ArticleJournal, genetic engineering & biotechnology2024
Human exons and introns classification using pre-trained Resnet-50 and GoogleNet models and 13-layers CNN model.
Article in Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Identification of Accessory Mental Foramen Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Convolutional Neural Networks.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Hybrid deep learning framework for accurate classification of high dimensional genomic data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Visualization of Runs of Homozygosity and Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks.Biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExamining functions and characteristics of DNA sequences is a highly challenging task. When it comes to the human genome, which is made up of exons and introns, this task is more challenging. Human exons and introns contain millions to billions of nucleotides, which contributes to the complexity observed in this sequences. Considering how complicated the subject of genomics is, it is obvious that using signal processing techniques and deep learning tools to build a strong predictive model can be very helpful for the development of the research of the human genome.
resultsAfter representing human exons and introns with color images using Frequency Chaos Game Representation, two pre-trained convolutional neural network models (Resnet-50 and GoogleNet) and a proposed CNN model having 13 hidden layers were used to classify our obtained images. We have reached a value of 92% for the accuracy rate for Resnet-50 model in about 7 h for the execution time, a value of 91.5% for the accuracy rate for the GoogleNet model in 2 h and a half for the execution time. For our proposed CNN model, we have reached 91.6% for the accuracy rate in 2 h and 37 min.
conclusionsOur proposed CNN model is faster than the Resnet-50 model in terms of execution time. It was able to slightly exceed the GoogleNet model for the accuracy rate value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.