ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2024
DNA Reference Reagents for Genotyping RH Variants.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Overcoming challenges for successful research sample collections in Ethiopia.Transfusion today · 2024Article
- Resolution ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients who carry Rhesus (RH) blood group variants may develop Rh alloantibodies requiring matched red blood cell transfusions. Serologic reagents for Rh variants often fail to specifically identify variant Rh antigens and are in limited supply. Therefore, red blood cell genotyping assays are essential for managing transfusions in patients with clinically relevant Rh variants. Well-characterized DNA reference reagents are needed to ensure quality and accuracy of the molecular tests. Eight lyophilized DNA reference reagents, representing 21 polymorphisms in RHD and RHCE, were produced from an existing repository of immortalized B-lymphoblastoid cell lines at the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research/US Food and Drug Administration. The material was validated through an international collaborative study involving 17 laboratories that evaluated each DNA candidate using molecular assays to characterize RHD and RHCE alleles, including commercial platforms and laboratory-developed testing, such as Sanger sequencing, next-generation sequencing, and third-generation sequencing. The genotyping results showed 99.4% agreement with the expected results for the target RH polymorphisms and 87.9% for RH allele agreement. Most of the discordant RH alleles results were explained by a limited polymorphism coverage in some genotyping methods. Results of stability and accelerated degradation studies support the suitability of these reagents for use as reference standards. The collaborative study results demonstrate the qualification of these eight DNA reagents for use as reference standards for RH blood group genotyping assay development and analytical validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.