ArticleJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2024
A quantitative MRI-based approach to estimate the permeation and retention of nanomedicines in tumors.
Article in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence empowered biomaterials for cancer therapy: From rational design to clinical translation.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026Article
- Low-dose X-ray-activated radiodynamic therapy via a lutetium-coordinated nanoplatform synergizing PARP inhibition and ferroptosis.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Emerging Nanoplatforms are Effective Against Tumor Hypoxia.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Nanomedicine in Ovarian Cancer: Advances in Imaging, Targeted Delivery, and Theranostic Therapeutic Platforms.Cancers · 2025Review
- Advances in Liposomal Drug Delivery: Multidirectional Perspectives on Overcoming Biological Barriers.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Different conjugates of FeRSC advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the potential of the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect in tumor passive targeting, many nanotherapeutics have failed to produce meaningful clinical outcomes due to the variable and challenging nature of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and EPR effect. This EPR variability across tumors and inconsistent translation of nanomedicines from preclinical to clinical settings necessitates a reliable method to assess its presence in individual tumors. This study aimed to develop a reliable and non-invasive approach to estimate the EPR effect in tumors using a clinically compatible quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) technique combined with a nano-sized MRI contrast agent. A quantitative MR imaging was developed using a dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI protocol. Then, the permeability and retention of the nano-sized MRI contrast agent were evaluated in three different ovarian xenograft tumor models. Results showed significant differences in EPR effects among the tumor models, with tumor growth influencing the calculated parameters of permeability (K
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.