Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38493234›Full record

ReviewAnnals of biomedical engineering2024

A Review on Automated Sleep Study.

Mehran Yazdi, Mahdi Samaee, Daniel Massicotte

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mehran YazdiLaboratory of Signal and System Integration, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada. Mehran.Yazdi@uqtr.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8889-7048
Mahdi SamaeeSignal and Image Processing Laboratory, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
Daniel MassicotteLaboratory of Signal and System Integration, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, research on automated sleep analysis has witnessed significant growth, reflecting advancements in understanding sleep patterns and their impact on overall health. This review synthesizes findings from an exhaustive analysis of 87 papers, systematically retrieved from prominent databases such as Google Scholar, PubMed, IEEE Xplore, and ScienceDirect. The selection criteria prioritized studies focusing on methods employed, signal modalities utilized, and machine learning algorithms applied in automated sleep analysis. The overarching goal was to critically evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the proposed methods, shedding light on the current landscape and future directions in sleep research. An in-depth exploration of the reviewed literature revealed a diverse range of methodologies and machine learning approaches employed in automated sleep studies. Notably, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Ensemble Learning Methods, and Support Vector Machine (SVM) emerged as versatile and potent classifiers, exhibiting high accuracies in various applications. However, challenges such as performance variability and computational demands were observed, necessitating judicious classifier selection based on dataset intricacies. In addition, the integration of traditional feature extraction methods with deep structures and the combination of different deep neural networks were identified as promising strategies to enhance diagnostic accuracy in sleep-related studies. The reviewed literature emphasized the need for adaptive classifiers, cross-modality integration, and collaborative efforts to drive the field toward more accurate, robust, and accessible sleep-related diagnostic solutions. This comprehensive review serves as a solid foundation for researchers and practitioners, providing an organized synthesis of the current state of knowledge in automated sleep analysis. By highlighting the strengths and challenges of various methodologies, this review aims to guide future research toward more effective and nuanced approaches to sleep diagnostics.

Indexed as

SleepElectroencephalographyHumansMachine LearningPolysomnographySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSupport Vector MachineDeep learningFeature extractionMachine learningSleep disorderSleep scoring systemSleep stageSleep study

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.