Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38493197›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

SpyMask enables combinatorial assembly of bispecific binders.

Claudia L Driscoll, Anthony H Keeble, Mark R Howarth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Conditionally Activatable Antibody Platforms: Mechanisms, Modalities, and Clinical Translation Potential.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Claudia L DriscollDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2285-6910
Anthony H KeebleDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QU, UK.
Mark R HowarthDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QU, UK. mh2186@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8870-7147

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S007369/1RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/T008784/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bispecific antibodies are a successful and expanding therapeutic class. Standard approaches to generate bispecifics are complicated by the need for disulfide reduction/oxidation or specialized formats. Here we present SpyMask, a modular approach to bispecifics using SpyTag/SpyCatcher spontaneous amidation. Two SpyTag-fused antigen-binding modules can be precisely conjugated onto DoubleCatcher, a tandem SpyCatcher where the second SpyCatcher is protease-activatable. We engineer a panel of structurally-distinct DoubleCatchers, from which binders project in different directions. We establish a generalized methodology for one-pot assembly and purification of bispecifics in 96-well plates. A panel of binders recognizing different HER2 epitopes were coupled to DoubleCatcher, revealing unexpected combinations with anti-proliferative or pro-proliferative activity on HER2-addicted cancer cells. Bispecific activity depended sensitively on both binder orientation and DoubleCatcher scaffold geometry. These findings support the need for straightforward assembly in different formats. SpyMask provides a scalable tool to discover synergy in bispecific activity, through modulating receptor organization and geometry.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BispecificEpitopesPeptide HydrolasesAntibodies, BispecificEpitopesPeptide Hydrolases

Identifiers

PMID38493197
PMCPMC10944524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.