Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38493120›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024

Using protein language models for protein interaction hot spot prediction with limited data.

Karen Sargsyan, Carmay Lim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Target discovery and drug design in the era of artificial intelligence.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Review
  2. Technical review of artificial intelligence in TCR-T therapy.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. MAVISp: A modular structure-based framework for protein variant effects.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karen SargsyanInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan. karen.sarkisyan@gmail.com.
Carmay LimInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan. carmay@gate.sinica.edu.tw.
Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica · TW

Funding

Academia Sinica AS-IA-107-L03Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST-98-2113-M-001-011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProtein language models, inspired by the success of large language models in deciphering human language, have emerged as powerful tools for unraveling the intricate code of life inscribed within protein sequences. They have gained significant attention for their promising applications across various areas, including the sequence-based prediction of secondary and tertiary protein structure, the discovery of new functional protein sequences/folds, and the assessment of mutational impact on protein fitness. However, their utility in learning to predict protein residue properties based on scant datasets, such as protein-protein interaction (PPI)-hotspots whose mutations significantly impair PPIs, remained unclear. Here, we explore the feasibility of using protein language-learned representations as features for machine learning to predict PPI-hotspots using a dataset containing 414 experimentally confirmed PPI-hotspots and 504 PPI-nonhot spots.

resultsOur findings showcase the capacity of unsupervised learning with protein language models in capturing critical functional attributes of protein residues derived from the evolutionary information encoded within amino acid sequences. We show that methods relying on protein language models can compete with methods employing sequence and structure-based features to predict PPI-hotspots from the free protein structure. We observed an optimal number of features for model precision, suggesting a balance between information and overfitting.

conclusionsThis study underscores the potential of transformer-based protein language models to extract critical knowledge from sparse datasets, exemplified here by the challenging realm of predicting PPI-hotspots. These models offer a cost-effective and time-efficient alternative to traditional experimental methods for predicting certain residue properties. However, the challenge of explaining why specific features are important for determining certain residue properties remains.

Indexed as

Machine LearningProteinsAmino Acid SequenceHumansProteinsESM-2Feature selectionPPI-hotspotProtein language modelsProtein–protein interactionSmall datasets

Identifiers

PMID38493120
PMCPMC10943781
OpenAlexW4392885247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.