ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024
Using protein language models for protein interaction hot spot prediction with limited data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Target discovery and drug design in the era of artificial intelligence.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026Review
- Technical review of artificial intelligence in TCR-T therapy.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2026Review
- SPPIDER-seq: sequence-based partner-aware predictor of protein-protein interaction sites.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- BindPred: a framework for predicting protein-protein binding affinity from language model embeddings.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- SPPIDER-seq: Sequence-based partner-aware predictor of protein-protein interaction sites.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- MAVISp: A modular structure-based framework for protein variant effects.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- Compressing the collective knowledge of ESM into a single protein language model.Nature methods · 2026Article
- Exploring the limits of pre-trained embeddings in machine-guided protein design: a case study on predicting AAV vector viability.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Application and Prospects of Large Language Models in Small-Molecule Drug Discovery.Analytical chemistry · 2025Review
- Enhancing the Feature Representation of Protein Sequence Descriptors in Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2025Article
- Advancing the Accuracy of Anti-MRSA Peptide Prediction Through Integrating Multi-Source Protein Language Models.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2025Article
- Beyond digital twins: the role of foundation models in enhancing the interpretability of multiomics modalities in precision medicine.FEBS open bio · 2025Review
- PLMFit: benchmarking transfer learning with protein language models for protein engineering.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Detection of protein structural hotspots using AI distillation and explainability: application to the DAX-1 protein.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Large Context, Deeper Insights: Harnessing Large Language Models for Advancing Protein-Protein Interaction Analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProtein language models, inspired by the success of large language models in deciphering human language, have emerged as powerful tools for unraveling the intricate code of life inscribed within protein sequences. They have gained significant attention for their promising applications across various areas, including the sequence-based prediction of secondary and tertiary protein structure, the discovery of new functional protein sequences/folds, and the assessment of mutational impact on protein fitness. However, their utility in learning to predict protein residue properties based on scant datasets, such as protein-protein interaction (PPI)-hotspots whose mutations significantly impair PPIs, remained unclear. Here, we explore the feasibility of using protein language-learned representations as features for machine learning to predict PPI-hotspots using a dataset containing 414 experimentally confirmed PPI-hotspots and 504 PPI-nonhot spots.
resultsOur findings showcase the capacity of unsupervised learning with protein language models in capturing critical functional attributes of protein residues derived from the evolutionary information encoded within amino acid sequences. We show that methods relying on protein language models can compete with methods employing sequence and structure-based features to predict PPI-hotspots from the free protein structure. We observed an optimal number of features for model precision, suggesting a balance between information and overfitting.
conclusionsThis study underscores the potential of transformer-based protein language models to extract critical knowledge from sparse datasets, exemplified here by the challenging realm of predicting PPI-hotspots. These models offer a cost-effective and time-efficient alternative to traditional experimental methods for predicting certain residue properties. However, the challenge of explaining why specific features are important for determining certain residue properties remains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.