Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38492231›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2024

Co-design of an intervention to improve patient participation in discharge medication communication.

Georgia Tobiano, Sharon Latimer, Elizabeth Manias, Andrea P Marshall, Megan Rattray, Kim Jenkinson, Trudy Teasdale, Kellie Wren, Wendy Chaboyer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Georgia TobianoCentre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Gold Coast, Queensland 4215, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5437-0777
Sharon LatimerCentre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Gold Coast, Queensland 4215, Australia.
Elizabeth ManiasSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3747-0087
Andrea P MarshallGold Coast Health, Gold Coast University Hospital, Hospital Boulevard, Gold Coast, Queensland 4215, Australia.
Megan RattrayCollege of Medicine & Public Health, Flinders University, 1284 South Road, Clovelly Park, Adelaide, South Australia 5042, Australia.
Kim JenkinsonGold Coast Health, Gold Coast University Hospital, Hospital Boulevard, Gold Coast, Queensland 4215, Australia.
Trudy TeasdaleGold Coast Health, Gold Coast University Hospital, Hospital Boulevard, Gold Coast, Queensland 4215, Australia.
Kellie WrenGold Coast Health, Gold Coast University Hospital, Hospital Boulevard, Gold Coast, Queensland 4215, Australia.
Wendy ChaboyerCentre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Gold Coast, Queensland 4215, Australia.
Griffith University · AUGold Coast Health · AUDeakin University · AUFlinders University · AU

Funding

Gold Coast Health and Gold Coast Foundation Collaborative Research Grant Scheme RGS2020-038NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care APP1196436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients can experience medication-related harm and hospital readmission because they do not understand or adhere to post-hospital medication instructions. Increasing patient medication literacy and, in turn, participation in medication conversations could be a solution. The purposes of this study were to co-design and test an intervention to enhance patient participation in hospital discharge medication communication. In terms of methods, co-design, a collaborative approach where stakeholders design solutions to problems, was used to develop a prototype medication communication intervention. First, our consumer and healthcare professional stakeholders generated intervention ideas. Next, inpatients, opinion leaders, and academic researchers collaborated to determine the most pertinent and feasible intervention ideas. Finally, the prototype intervention was shown to six intended end-users (i.e. hospital patients) who underwent usability interviews and completed the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability questionnaire. The final intervention comprised of a suite of three websites: (i) a medication search engine; (ii) resources to help patients manage their medications once home; and (iii) a question builder tool. The intervention has been tested with intended end-users and results of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability questionnaire have shown that the intervention is acceptable. Identified usability issues have been addressed. In conclusion, this co-designed intervention provides patients with trustworthy resources that can help them to understand medication information and ask medication-related questions, thus promoting medication literacy and patient participation. In turn, this intervention could enhance patients' medication self-efficacy and healthcare utilization. Using a co-design approach ensured authentic consumer and other stakeholder engagement, while allowing opinion leaders and researchers to ensure that a feasible intervention was developed.

Indexed as

Patient DischargePatient ParticipationCommunicationHumansPatient Readmissioncommunicationinpatientspatient dischargepatient medication knowledgepatient participationpatient preference

Identifiers

PMID38492231
PMCPMC10944286
OpenAlexW4392878771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.