ArticleInternational journal of hematology2024
Prognostic model for relapsed/refractory transplant-ineligible diffuse large B-cell lymphoma utilizing the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- "Monocytes in B-Cell Malignancies: Their Role in Disease Progression and Therapy Resistance".Current oncology reports · 2025Review
- Bispecific Antibodies-A New Hope for Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Tumor Microenvironment, Inflammation, and Inflammatory Prognostic Indices in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomas: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study in 100 transplant-ineligible (TI) patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) that relapsed or progressed after first-line R-CHOP (or -like) therapy to develop a robust predictive model for TI relapsed/refractory (r/r) DLBCL, which has a heterogeneous but poor prognosis by currently available treatment modalities other than chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy or bispecific antibodies. The median age at relapse or progression was 76 years. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the first progression were 11.5 months and 21.9 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified low lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), elevated high lactate dehydrogenase, and elevated C-reactive protein at progression as independent predictors of OS. A predictive model based on these three factors, here designated as the Kyoto Prognostic Index for r/r DLBCL (KPI-R), successfully stratified their OS and PFS with statistical significance. In addition, event-free survival less than 24 months for R-CHOP and low LMR were identified as significant predictive factors for non-response in any sequence of salvage therapy. We concluded that LMR is a bonafide predictor of treatment response and prognosis in patients with TI r/r DLBCL, and may be helpful in treatment decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.