Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38492077›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2024

Improved early continence following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the urethral hammock technique.

Gernot Ortner, Hanne-Rose Honis, Julia Böhm, Marko Konschake, Theodoros Tokas, Udo Nagele

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06754488 (A New Vesicocervical Urethral Reconstruction Technique Improves Urinary Continence in Patients After Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06754488 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A New Vesicocervical Urethral Reconstruction Technique Improves Urinary Continence in Patients After Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: a Single-center Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSuzhou Municipal HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled120ConditionsPosterior Bladder Wall Reconstruction, Anterior Bladder Wall Reconstruction, Anterior Bladder Wall SuspensionArmsPosterior Reconstruction, anterior suspension
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gernot OrtnerDepartment of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall I.T., Milser Straße 10, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria. gerni_o@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2454-6599
Hanne-Rose HonisInstitute of Clinical and Functional Anatomy, Medical University of Innsbruck (MUI), Innsbruck, Austria.
Julia BöhmDepartment of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall I.T., Milser Straße 10, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Marko KonschakeInstitute of Clinical and Functional Anatomy, Medical University of Innsbruck (MUI), Innsbruck, Austria.
Theodoros TokasDepartment of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall I.T., Milser Straße 10, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Udo NageleDepartment of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall I.T., Milser Straße 10, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo introduce and illustrate a novel urethral reconstruction technique-the 'urethral hammock-technique'-and to assess its impact on early postoperative continence following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP).

methods119 patients who underwent LRP between January 2020 and May 2022 (hammock group: n = 43, control group: n = 76) were included in the study. The primary outcome was continence (zero pads or max. one security pad) at 1, 3, and 6 months following surgery. Secondary outcomes were operative time, complications, and histological findings. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to reveal predictors for continence. p values < 0.05 with a two-sided 95%-confidence interval were considered statistically significant.

resultsBaseline characteristics were comparable among both groups. The number of patients achieving complete continence in both the hammock and control groups at various time intervals was: 4 weeks 37.2% (16/43) vs. 19.2% (14/73) (p = 0.047); 3 months 60.5% (26/43) vs. 37.3% (28/75) (p = 0.021) and 6 months 72.1% (31/43) vs. 60.3% (44/73) (p = 0.23), respectively. Adjusting for bladder neck preservation status and age, the hammock technique was a significant predictor for continence for the 4-week (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13-0.83, p = 0.019) and 3-month (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.12-0.66, p = 0.004) interval but not for the 6-month interval (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.27-1.5, p = 0.31). Operative time, complication rates, time till catheter extraction and histological findings were comparable between both groups (all p > 0.05).

conclusionsThe hammock technique is a simple and reproducible technique to improve early postoperative continence for at least 3 months following surgery. However, these promising results warrant confirmation through a randomized controlled trial.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyUrinary IncontinenceHumansMaleProstatectomyRecovery of FunctionUrethraUrinary BladderContinenceHammock techniqueProstate cancerRadical prostatectomyReconstructionUrinary incontinence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.