SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2024
Standard medical therapy with vs. without nebulised magnesium for children with asthma decompensation.
Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative efficacy and safety of intravenous versus nebulized magnesium sulfate for acute asthma exacerbations: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Intravenous and Nebulized MgSOChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Magnesium for disease treatment and prevention: emerging mechanisms and opportunities.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediatric asthma is a common condition, and its exacerbations can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The role of nebulised magnesium as adjunct therapy for children with asthma exacerbations is still unclear. To compare clinical and functional outcomes for children with asthma exacerbation taking either nebulised magnesium sulfate added to standard medical therapy (SMT) versus SMT alone. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for randomised clinical trials (RCT) comparing the use of SMT with vs. without nebulised magnesium. The outcomes were respiratory rate, heart rate, % predicted peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), % predicted forced expiratory volume (FEV1), peripheral O
conclusionIn children with asthma exacerbation, treatment with nebulised magnesium and SMT was associated with a statistically significant, but small improvement in predicted PEFR and respiratory rate, as compared with SMT alone. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Magnesium sulfate has bronchodilating properties and aids in the treatment of asthma exacerbation when administered intravenously. • There is no significant evidence of benefit of nebulised magnesium as an adjunct therapy to the standard medical treatment for children with asthma exacerbations. WHAT IS NEW: • Our study suggests nebulised magnesium sulfate may have a statistically significant, but small benefit in respiratory rate and peak expiratory flow rate. The addition of nebulised magnesium does not seem to increase adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.