ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2024
Parametric Solid Models of the At-Term Uterus From Magnetic Resonance Images.
Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Biomechanical Regulation in Physiological and Pathological Pregnancy: From Mechanotransduction to Clinical Implications.International journal of biological sciences · 2026Review
- Finite element modeling in obstetrics and gynecology: advances, applications, and challenges.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Parametric Solid Models of the At-Term Uterus From Magnetic Resonance Images.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Birthing mechanics are poorly understood, though many injuries during childbirth are mechanical, like fetal and maternal tissue damage. Several biomechanical simulation models of parturition have been proposed to investigate birth, but many do not include the uterus. Additionally, most solid models rely on segmenting anatomical structures from clinical images to generate patient geometry, which can be time-consuming. This work presents two new parametric solid modeling methods for generating patient-specific, at-term uterine three-dimensional geometry. Building from an established method of modeling the sagittal uterine shape, this work improves the uterine coronal shape, especially where the fetal head joins the lower uterine wall. Solid models of the uterus and cervix were built from five at-term patients' magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sets. Using anatomy measurements from MRI-segmented models, two parametric models were created-one that employs an averaged coronal uterine shape and one with multiple axial measurements of the coronal uterus. Through finite element analysis, the two new parametric methods were compared to the MRI-segmented high-fidelity method and a previously published elliptical low-fidelity method. A clear improvement in the at-term uterine shape was found using the two new parametric methods, and agreement in principal Lagrange strain directions was observed across all modeling methods. These methods provide an effective and efficient way to generate three-dimensional solid models of patient-specific maternal uterine anatomy, advancing possibilities for future research in computational birthing biomechanics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.