Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38491950›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2024

Susceptibility of Mangifera indica (Sapindales: Anacardiaceae) cultivars to fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in 2 agroecological zones of Cameroon.

Didi Gaëlle Mokam, Ndakabo Atougour, Zephirin Tadu, Désirée Chantal Aléné, Ezechiel Awono, Serge Lontsi Tapeo, Leonard Simon Ngamo Tinkeu, Champlain Djieto-Lordon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Didi Gaëlle MokamFaculty of Science, Department of Biological Science, Laboratory of Zoology, University of Ngaoundéré, P.O. Box 454, Ngaoundéré, Cameroon.ORCID 0000-0001-9714-6425
Ndakabo AtougourFaculty of Science, Department of Animal Biology and Physiology, Laboratory of Zoology, University of Yaoundé I, P.O. Box 812, Yaoundé, Cameroon.ORCID 0009-0001-4496-9388
Zephirin TaduFaculty of Science, Department of Animal Biology and Physiology, Laboratory of Zoology, University of Yaoundé I, P.O. Box 812, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Désirée Chantal AlénéFaculty of Science, Department of Animal Biology and Physiology, Laboratory of Zoology, University of Yaoundé I, P.O. Box 812, Yaoundé, Cameroon.ORCID 0000-0002-9822-0786
Ezechiel AwonoFaculty of Science, Department of Animal Biology and Physiology, Laboratory of Zoology, University of Yaoundé I, P.O. Box 812, Yaoundé, Cameroon.ORCID 0009-0004-0098-3403
Serge Lontsi TapeoFaculty of Science, Department of Biological Science, Laboratory of Zoology, University of Ngaoundéré, P.O. Box 454, Ngaoundéré, Cameroon.ORCID 0009-0008-3657-3296
Leonard Simon Ngamo TinkeuFaculty of Science, Department of Biological Science, Laboratory of Zoology, University of Ngaoundéré, P.O. Box 454, Ngaoundéré, Cameroon.ORCID 0000-0003-1142-6536
Champlain Djieto-LordonFaculty of Science, Department of Animal Biology and Physiology, Laboratory of Zoology, University of Yaoundé I, P.O. Box 812, Yaoundé, Cameroon.ORCID 0000-0003-3144-7449

Funding

Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur, Republique du Cameroun
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Sudano-Sahelian and the high Guinea savannahs agroecological zones of Cameroon are suitable for the full development of tree crops, including mango. Unfortunately, fresh fruits exported to local and international markets are frequently rejected due to the presence of fruit fly larvae (Diptera: Tephritidae), resulting in drastic income losses and overuse of chemical control products. To promote sustainable management strategies, a 2-yr study (2020-2021) was conducted in 4 and 3 mixed orchards, respectively. Attacked mangoes showing signs of fruit fly damage were collected and taken to the laboratory to rear and identify fruit flies. Repeated grafting and agroclimatic differences were responsible for dissimilarities between the 2 zones, with 18 and 16 cultivars, respectively. From 2,857 attacked mangoes, 26,707 fruit flies belonging to 4 species were identified: Bactrocera dorsalis, Ceratitis cosyra, Ceratitis fasciventris, and Ceratitis anonae. Climate change was the factor determining the distribution of the 2 most important mango fruit flies: B. dorsalis was a wetland species (dominance/occurrence > 70%), while C. cosyra was a dry-land species (dominance/occurrence > 75%). Both species were responsible for high levels of infestations. Bactrocera dorsalis preferred 3 mango cultivars, namely Palmer and Smith in Zone 1, and Ifack 1 in Zone 2 (infestation > 20 individuals/100 g of mango). The host-plant spectrum of C. cosyra was modified by alternative host plants. Both C. fasciventris and C. anonae were rare. Findings from this study could guide researchers in the development of monitoring tools for fruit fly populations and, subsequently, in reducing the damage they cause to mangoes.

Indexed as

AnacardiaceaeMangiferaTephritidaeAnimalsCameroonDrosophilaHumansLarvaBactrocera dorsalisCeratitis cosyraecological distributioninfestation ratemango

Identifiers

PMID38491950
PMCPMC10943628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.