Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38491444›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2024

Trends in pre-hospital volume resuscitation of blunt trauma patients: a 15-year analysis of the British (TARN) and German (TraumaRegister DGU®) National Registries.

M F Bath, J Schloer, J Strobel, W Rea, R Lefering, M Maegele, H De'Ath, Z B Perkins

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M F Bath *Centre for Trauma Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London, London, UK.
J Schloer *Centre for Trauma Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London, London, UK.
J StrobelLondon's Air Ambulance, London, UK.
W ReaCentre for Trauma Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London, London, UK.
R LeferingInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine, Cologne Merheim Medical Center, University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany.
M MaegeleInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine, Cologne Merheim Medical Center, University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany.
H De'AthCentre for Trauma Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London, London, UK.
Z B PerkinsCentre for Trauma Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London, London, UK. z.perkins@qmul.ac.uk.
Queen Mary University of London · GBWitten/Herdecke University · DEMSH Medical School Hamburg – University of Applied Sciences and Medical University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFluid resuscitation has long been a cornerstone of pre-hospital trauma care, yet its optimal approach remains undetermined. Although a liberal approach to fluid resuscitation has been linked with increased complications, the potential survival benefits of a restrictive approach in blunt trauma patients have not been definitively established. Consequently, equipoise persists regarding the optimal fluid resuscitation strategy in this population.

methodsWe analysed data from the two largest European trauma registries, the UK Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) and the German TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU), between 2004 and 2018. All adult blunt trauma patients with an Injury Severity Score > 15 were included. We examined annual trends in pre-hospital fluid resuscitation, admission coagulation function, and mortality rates.

resultsOver the 15-year study period, data from 68,510 patients in the TARN cohort and 82,551 patients in the TR-DGU cohort were analysed. In the TARN cohort, 3.4% patients received pre-hospital crystalloid fluids, with a median volume of 25 ml (20-36 ml) administered. Conversely, in the TR-DGU cohort, 91.1% patients received pre-hospital crystalloid fluids, with a median volume of 756 ml (750-912 ml) administered. Notably, both cohorts demonstrated a consistent year-on-year decrease in the volume of pre-hospital fluid administered, accompanied by improvements in admission coagulation function and reduced mortality rates.

conclusionConsiderable variability exists in pre-hospital fluid resuscitation strategies for blunt trauma patients. Our data suggest a trend towards reduced pre-hospital fluid administration over time. This trend appears to be associated with improved coagulation function and decreased mortality rates. However, we acknowledge that these outcomes are influenced by multiple factors, including other improvements in pre-hospital care over time. Future research should aim to identify which trauma populations may benefit, be harmed, or remain unaffected by different pre-hospital fluid resuscitation strategies.

Indexed as

Multiple TraumaWounds, NonpenetratingAdultCrystalloid SolutionsGermanyHospitalsHumansInjury Severity ScoreRegistriesRetrospective StudiesCrystalloid SolutionsCrystalloidsFluidsOutcomesResuscitationTrauma

Identifiers

PMID38491444
PMCPMC10941386
OpenAlexW4392863877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.