ArticleBMC microbiology2024
High prevalence of ST5-SCCmec II-t311 clone of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bloodstream infections in East China.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efflux pump QacA mediates the transition to vancomycin heteroresistance in sequence type 5 methicillin-resistantEmerging microbes & infections · 2026Article
- Genotypic and phenotypic features of MRSA with an incomplete hemolysis phenotype in a tertiary teaching hospital in China.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Methicillin-resistantiScience · 2026Review
- Genomic driver underlies clonal shift of methicillin-resistantEmerging microbes & infections · 2025Article
- Cryptotanshinone targets the bacterial membrane and inhibits methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.AMB Express · 2025Article
- Clonal shift and impact of azithromycin use on antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bloodstream infection during the COVID-19 pandemic.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a challenging global health threat, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. This study aims to determine the molecular characteristics and antimicrobial susceptibility of 263 MRSA isolates in Zhejiang Province, east China.
methodsFrom 2014 to 2019, a total of 263 MRSA isolates from bloodstream infections (BSIs) were collected from 6 hospitals in 4 cities in Zhejiang province, east China. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were conducted according to the guidelines set forth by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). To characterize and analyze these isolates, multilocus sequence typing (MLST), staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing, staphylococcal protein A (spa) typing and virulence genes gene profiles were performed.
resultsThe most predominant clone was ST5-SCCmec II-t311, which accounted for 41.8% (110/263), followed by ST59 (44/263, 16.7%). Compared with non-ST5-II-t311 isolates, ST5-II-t311 isolates were more resistant to erythromycin, tetracycline, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and ciprofloxacin, but more susceptible to clindamycin. Moreover, the rates of multidrug resistance were higher in ST5-II-t311 isolates compared to the non-ST5-II-t311 isolates. In comparison to the non-ST5-II-t311 isolates, ST5-II-t311 isolates showed no significant difference in virulence genes detected.
conclusionsMRSA ST5-II-t311 clone has become the most predominant clone in Zhejiang Province, east China and has higher rates of multidrug resistance than other isolates, that should be kept in mind when treating BSI. Moreover, MRSA ST59 clone shows an upward trend and has begun to spread into hospitals. Our findings highlight the importance of epidemiological studies of S. aureus carriage in the eastern region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.