Trial reportBMC medical education2024
Development and effectiveness of a BOPPPS teaching model-based workshop for community pharmacists training.
Trial report in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Interventions to improve pharmacists' competency in chronic disease management: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.BMC medical education · 2024Pooled it
- Educational effects of a workshop on quantitative drug-drug interaction assessment for pharmacists: a pre-post study.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2026Article
- Enhancing cardiovascular disease risk communication in diabetes care using Kern's six-step model: development and pilot of a training program for general practitioners.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Effect of educational intervention on polypharmacy management among community pharmacists: An interrupted time series analysis.Annals of clinical epidemiology · 2026Article
- An empirical study of the BOPPPS teaching model in standardized training for vascular surgery residents: teaching of diabetic foot Wagner classification and surgical intervention strategies.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Analysis of the effectiveness of SPOC combined with BOPPPS teaching method in stoma care training for nurses in neonatal intensive care units.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Application of scenario simulation based on boppps model in physical diagnostics--a practical exploration of integrated teaching mode for cardiac physical examination and electrocardiogram.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Enhancement of shared decision-making competencies in diabetes care using the BOPPPS model: a training program design for general practitioners.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- The effects of single and multiple BOPPPS-integrated model sessions on public health students' competences: a two-stage study combining quasi-experimental and cross-sectional analyses.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- The combination of a SPOC with evaluative interactive learning in dental adhesion education: a comparison with a lecture-based learning mode.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimWith the pharmaceutical innovation and clinical knowledge updating, the continuing education and on-the-job training are extremely important for improving community pharmacists' professional competence. Previous training often adopted traditional lecture-based teaching, and the efficacy was limited. The aim of this study is to develop a new strategy for community pharmacist training.
methodsBased on the BOPPPS (Bridge-in, Objective, Pre-assessment, Participatory Learning, Post-assessment and Summary) teaching model and workshop method, a continuing on-the-job training program was constructed. Participates were randomly and evenly divided into two groups by random number table method. Twenty-four community pharmacists in total completed all training contents and evaluation components in this study. Twelve pharmacists in experimental group were trained via this new BOPPPS-based workshop, while others still adopted traditional didactic lecture-based approaches.
resultsAfter training, quantitative examination combined with clinical pharmacy practice tests were carried out to evaluate the effectiveness and outcomes of two training groups. For written exam, the total scores from the BOPPPS-based workshop group (82.67 ± 4.70) was higher than that of traditional lectured-base group (73.75 ± 6.15) (P < 0.001). Encouragingly, compared with the results of practical ability assessment from traditional training group (71.75 ± 4.75), the pharmacists receiving BOPPPS-based workshop training presented more excellent performance (78.25 ± 5.03), which displayed statistically significant differences (P < 0.01). In addition, an anonymous questionnaire was used to survey trainees' feelings after completing this continuing education program. The results revealed that the BOPPPS-based workshop can bring a better learning experience than traditional lecture-based training, and the percentages of positive response to each item were more than 91.7%.
conclusionsThrough multi-dimensional evaluation, it was suggested that our BOPPPS-based workshop achieved desired training effects. Moreover, our research also demonstrated that this strategy had advantages of stimulating inspiration, autonomous learning, team-work spirit and pharmacy practice improvement. It may provide a reference of innovative training method for community pharmacists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.