ArticleBMC microbiology2024
Characteristics of the oral and gastric microbiome in patients with early-stage intramucosal esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the Diagnostic and Predictive Value of Oral Microbiome in Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Gut microbiota biomarkers of chronic kidney disease progression identified by 16S rDNA sequencing and machine learning.Renal failure · 2026Article
- Cross-site oral and esophageal microbiome signatures define diagnostic patterns and reveal mechanistic drivers of ESCC.iScience · 2026Article
- Article
- A generalizable cross-continent prediction of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using the oral microbiome.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Identification of Oral Microbiome Biomarkers Associated with Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Radiotherapy Response Prediction.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Intestinal and esophageal microbiota in esophageal cancer development and treatment.Gut microbes · 2025Review
- A generalizable cross-continent prediction of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using the oral microbiome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The comprehensive oral microbiome landscape unveils its interplay with poor oral health in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma risk.Cell reports. Medicine · 2025Article
- Association Between Oral Microbiota and Gastrointestinal/Extra-Gastrointestinal Diseases.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2024Review
- Association between Oral Microbiome and Gastroesophageal Reflux Severity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Succession of the multi-site microbiome along pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma tumorigenesis.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOral microbiome dysbacteriosis has been reported to be associated with the pathogenesis of advanced esophageal cancer. However, few studies investigated the potential role of oral and gastric microbiota in early-stage intramucosal esophageal squamous carcinoma (EIESC).
methodA total of 104 samples were collected from 31 patients with EIESC and 21 healthy controls. The compositions of oral and gastric microbiota were analyzed using 16 S rRNA V3-V4 amplicon sequencing. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analysis was performed to assess taxonomic differences between groups. The correlation between oral microbiota and clinicopathological factors was evaluated using Spearman correlation analysis. Additionally, co-occurrence networks were established and random forest models were utilized to identify significant microbial biomarkers for distinguishing between the EIESC and control groups.
resultsA total of 292 oral genera and 223 species were identified in both EIESC and healthy controls. Six oral genera were remarkably enriched in EIESC groups, including the genera Porphyromonas, Shigella, Subdoligranulum, Leptotrichia, Paludibacter, and Odoribacter. LEfSe analysis identified genera Porphyromonas and Leptotrichia with LDA scores > 3. In the random forest model, Porphyromonas endodontalis ranked the top microbial biomarker to differentiate EIESC from controls. The elimination rate of Porphyromonas endodontalis from the oral cavity to the stomach was also dramatically decreased in the EIESC group than controls. In the microbial co-occurrence network, Porphyromonas endodontalis was positively correlated with Prevotella tannerae and Prevotella intermedia and was negatively correlated with Veillonella dispar.
conclusionOur study potentially indicates that the dysbacteriosis of both the oral and gastric microbiome was associated with EIESC. Larger scale studies and experimental animal models are urgently needed to confirm the possible role of microbial dysbacteriosis in the pathogenesis of EIESC. (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Center, ChiCTR2200063464, Registered 07 September 2022, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=178563).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.