ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2024
Machine learning approach using
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep Learning-Based CT-Less Cardiac Segmentation of PET Images: A Robust Methodology for Multi-Tracer Nuclear Cardiovascular Imaging.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- The Role of [18F]FDG PET-Based Radiomics and Machine Learning for the Evaluation of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Narrative Literature Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Non-Invasive Procedure in Differential Diagnosis of Sarcoidosis and Tuberculosis Lymph Nodes: Radiomic Model of 18F-FDG PET-CT.Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG · 2025Article
- Review
- Arrhythmias in Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Management and Prognostic Implications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the usefulness of machine learning (ML) models using pretreatment MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 47 patients with CS who underwent
resultsPatients who developed ACEs presented with a significantly higher surface area and gray level run length matrix run length non-uniformity (GLRLM_RLNU), and lower neighborhood gray-tone difference matrix_coarseness and sphericity than those without ACEs (each, p < 0.05). In the training cohort, all seven ML algorithms had a good classification performance with AUC values of > 0.80 (range: 0.841-0.944). In the testing cohort, the RF algorithm had the highest AUC and accuracy (88.9% [8/9]) with a similar classification performance between training and testing cohorts (AUC: 0.945 vs 0.889). GLRLM_RLNU was the most important feature of the modeling process of this RF algorithm.
conclusionML analyses using
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.