Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38491234›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024

Differential Diagnosis of Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis and Charcot Neuropathic Osteoarthropathy with Deep Learning Methods.

Maide Cakir, Gökalp Tulum, Ferhat Cuce, Kerim Bora Yilmaz, Ayse Aralasmak, Muhammet İkbal Isik, Hüseyin Canbolat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maide CakirDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Bandirma Onyedi Eylul University, Balikesir, Turkey. maidecakrr@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2831-8104
Gökalp TulumDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Istanbul Topkapi University, Engineering Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ferhat CuceDepartment of Radiology, Health Science University, Gulhane Training, and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Kerim Bora YilmazDepartment of General Surgery, Health Science University, Gulhane Training and Research, Ankara, Turkey.
Ayse AralasmakDepartment of Radiology, Liv Hospital Vadi, Istanbul, Turkey.
Muhammet İkbal IsikDepartment of Radiology, Health Sciences University, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Hüseyin CanbolatDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our study aims to evaluate the potential of a deep learning (DL) algorithm for differentiating the signal intensity of bone marrow between osteomyelitis (OM), Charcot neuropathic osteoarthropathy (CNO), and trauma (TR). The local ethics committee approved this retrospective study. From 148 patients, segmentation resulted in 679 labeled regions for T1-weighted images (comprising 151 CNO, 257 OM, and 271 TR) and 714 labeled regions for T2-weighted images (consisting of 160 CNO, 272 OM, and 282 TR). We employed both multi-class classification (MCC) and binary-class classification (BCC) approaches to compare the classification outcomes of CNO, TR, and OM. The ResNet-50 and the EfficientNet-b0 accuracy values were computed at 96.2% and 97.1%, respectively, for T1-weighted images. Additionally, accuracy values for ResNet-50 and the EfficientNet-b0 were determined at 95.6% and 96.8%, respectively, for T2-weighted images. Also, according to BCC for CNO, OM, and TR, the sensitivity of ResNet-50 is 91.1%, 92.4%, and 96.6% and the sensitivity of EfficientNet-b0 is 93.2%, 97.6%, and 98.1% for T1, respectively. For CNO, OM, and TR, the sensitivity of ResNet-50 is 94.9%, 83.6%, and 97.9% and the sensitivity of EfficientNet-b0 is 95.6%, 85.2%, and 98.6% for T2, respectively. The specificity values of ResNet-50 for CNO, OM, and TR in T1-weighted images are 98.1%, 97.9%, and 94.7% and 98.6%, 97.5%, and 96.7% in T2-weighted images respectively. Similarly, for EfficientNet-b0, the specificity values are 98.9%, 98.7%, and 98.4% and 99.1%, 98.5%, and 98.7% for T1-weighted and T2-weighted images respectively. In the diabetic foot, deep learning methods serve as a non-invasive tool to differentiate CNO, OM, and TR with high accuracy.

Indexed as

Arthropathy, NeurogenicDeep LearningDiabetic FootMagnetic Resonance ImagingOsteomyelitisAlgorithmsDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesCharcot neuropathic osteoarthropathyDeep learningDiabetic footOsteomyelitis

Identifiers

PMID38491234
PMCPMC11522243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.