ReviewPediatric radiology2024
Pictorial review: challenges in distinguishing bilateral metaphyseal marrow abnormalities on magnetic resonance imaging.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Imaging evaluation of rheumatologic musculoskeletal disorders in children.Skeletal radiology · 2025Review
- Imaging paediatric bone marrow in immunocompromised patients.Pediatric radiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The paediatric metaphysis is afflicted by a wide range of pathological processes as it is the most metabolically active and well-vascularised part of the developing skeleton. This review focuses on metaphyseal marrow signal change detected with magnetic resonance imaging, which is most often occult on radiographs. When bilateral, these imaging appearances frequently present a diagnostic quandary. This review assists the radiologist to confidently dismiss physiological signal change and confidently work through the differential diagnosis. This is achieved by illustrating a practical method of classifying signal change into four categories: physiological red marrow, red marrow reconversion, marrow infiltration, and oedema-like marrow signal intensity. In doing so, various pathological entities are reviewed along with imaging pearls and next-step investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38491225What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.