Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38491221›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2024

GC Content Across Insect Genomes: Phylogenetic Patterns, Causes and Consequences.

Riccardo G Kyriacou, Peter O Mulhair, Peter W H Holland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Impact of GC content on de novo gene birth.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Why sequence the genome of every species? A view from evolutionary biology.Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Satellitome Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Riccardo G KyriacouDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID 0009-0008-6101-893X
Peter O MulhairDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3311-4883
Peter W H HollandDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK. peter.holland@biology.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1533-9376

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 218328Wellcome Trust 226458
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proportions of A:T and G:C nucleotide pairs are often unequal and can vary greatly between animal species and along chromosomes. The causes and consequences of this variation are incompletely understood. The recent release of high-quality genome sequences from the Darwin Tree of Life and other large-scale genome projects provides an opportunity for GC heterogeneity to be compared across a large number of insect species. Here we analyse GC content along chromosomes, and within protein-coding genes and codons, of 150 insect species from four holometabolous orders: Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, and Lepidoptera. We find that protein-coding sequences have higher GC content than the genome average, and that Lepidoptera generally have higher GC content than the other three insect orders examined. GC content is higher in small chromosomes in most Lepidoptera species, but this pattern is less consistent in other orders. GC content also increases towards subtelomeric regions within protein-coding genes in Diptera, Coleoptera and Lepidoptera. Two species of Diptera, Bombylius major and B. discolor, have very atypical genomes with ubiquitous increase in AT content, especially at third codon positions. Despite dramatic AT-biased codon usage, we find no evidence that this has driven divergent protein evolution. We argue that the GC landscape of Lepidoptera, Diptera and Coleoptera genomes is influenced by GC-biased gene conversion, strongest in Lepidoptera, with some outlier taxa affected drastically by counteracting processes.

Indexed as

Genome, InsectInsectaAnimalsBase CompositionCodonEvolution, MolecularPhylogenyCodonBee-fliesBiased gene conversionGenome evolutionNucleotide composition

Identifiers

PMID38491221
PMCPMC10978632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.