Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38491157›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A comprehensive DNA barcoding reference database for Plecoptera of Switzerland.

Laurent Vuataz, Jean-Paul Reding, Alexis Reding, Christian Roesti, Céline Stoffel, Gilles Vinçon, Jean-Luc Gattolliat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluating methods for B-cell clonal family assignment.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laurent VuatazDépartement de zoologie, Palais de Rumine, Muséum cantonal des sciences naturelles, Place Riponne 6, 1005, Lausanne, Switzerland. laurent.vuataz@vd.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-9193-8683
Jean-Paul Reding, Corcelles, Switzerland.
Alexis Reding, Corcelles, Switzerland.
Christian Roesti, Bern, Switzerland.
Céline StoffelDépartement de zoologie, Palais de Rumine, Muséum cantonal des sciences naturelles, Place Riponne 6, 1005, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Gilles Vinçon, Grenoble, France.
Jean-Luc GattolliatDépartement de zoologie, Palais de Rumine, Muséum cantonal des sciences naturelles, Place Riponne 6, 1005, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA barcoding is an essential tool in modern biodiversity sciences. Despite considerable work to barcode the tree of life, many groups, including insects, remain partially or totally unreferenced, preventing barcoding from reaching its full potential. Aquatic insects, especially the three orders Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera (EPT), are key freshwater quality indicators worldwide. Among them, Plecoptera (stoneflies), which are among the most sensitive aquatic insects to habitat modification, play a central role in river monitoring surveys. Here, we present an update of the Plecoptera reference database for (meta)barcoding in Switzerland, now covering all 118 species known from this country. Fresh specimens, mostly from rare or localized species, were collected, and 151 new CO1 barcodes were generated. These were merged with the 422 previously published sequences, resulting in a dataset of 573 barcoded specimens. Our CO1 dataset was delimited in 115 CO1 clusters based on a priori morphological identifications, of which 17% are newly reported for Switzerland, and 4% are newly reported globally. Among the 115 CO1 clusters, 85% showed complete congruence with morphology. Distance-based analysis indicated local barcoding gaps in 97% of the CO1 clusters. This study significantly improves the Swiss reference database for stoneflies, enhancing future species identification accuracy and biodiversity monitoring. Additionally, this work reveals cryptic diversity and incongruence between morphology and barcodes, both presenting valuable opportunities for future integrative taxonomic studies. Voucher specimens, DNA extractions and reference barcodes are available for future developments, including metabarcoding and environmental DNA surveys.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicInsectaAnimalsBiodiversityEcosystemSwitzerlandAquatic insectsMorphologySpecies delimitationStonefliesWater monitoring

Identifiers

PMID38491157
PMCPMC10943188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.