Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38491101›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2024

A systematic pan-cancer study on deep learning-based prediction of multi-omic biomarkers from routine pathology images.

Salim Arslan, Julian Schmidt, Cher Bass, Debapriya Mehrotra, Andre Geraldes, Shikha Singhal, Julius Hense, Xiusi Li, Pandu Raharja-Liu, Oscar Maiques and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Using artificial intelligence to prioritize pathology samples: report of a test drive.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Salim ArslanPanakeia Technologies, London, UK. salim@panakeia.ai.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4329-0947
Julian SchmidtPanakeia Technologies, London, UK.
Cher BassPanakeia Technologies, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7928-3394
Debapriya MehrotraPanakeia Technologies, London, UK.
Andre GeraldesPanakeia Technologies, London, UK.
Shikha SinghalPanakeia Technologies, London, UK.
Julius HensePanakeia Technologies, London, UK.
Xiusi LiPanakeia Technologies, London, UK.
Pandu Raharja-LiuPanakeia Technologies, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6707-6278
Oscar MaiquesCytoskeleton and Cancer Metastasis Group, Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Jakob Nikolas KatherMedical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3730-5348
Pahini PandyaPanakeia Technologies, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this comprehensive pan-cancer study is to evaluate the potential of deep learning (DL) for molecular profiling of multi-omic biomarkers directly from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole slide images.

methodsA total of 12,093 DL models predicting 4031 multi-omic biomarkers across 32 cancer types were trained and validated. The study included a broad range of genetic, transcriptomic, and proteomic biomarkers, as well as established prognostic markers, molecular subtypes, and clinical outcomes.

resultsHere we show that 50% of the models achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.644 or higher. The observed AUC for 25% of the models is at least 0.719 and exceeds 0.834 for the top 5%. Molecular profiling with image-based histomorphological features is generally considered feasible for most of the investigated biomarkers and across different cancer types. The performance appears to be independent of tumor purity, sample size, and class ratio (prevalence), suggesting a degree of inherent predictability in histomorphology.

conclusionsThe results demonstrate that DL holds promise to predict a wide range of biomarkers across the omics spectrum using only H&E-stained histological slides of solid tumors. This paves the way for accelerating diagnosis and developing more precise treatments for cancer patients.

Identifiers

PMID38491101
PMCPMC10942985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.