ArticleScientific reports2024
Contribution of intramacrophage stages to Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection outcome in zebrafish embryos: insights from mgtC and oprF mutants.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Analysis of virulence of the emerging opportunistic human pathogen Achromobacter in a zebrafish embryo model.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- EPY001, a Novel Monoclonal Antibody AgainstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Intracellular Pseudomonas aeruginosa persist and evade antibiotic treatment in a wound infection model.PLoS pathogens · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Pseudomonas aeruginosa often colonizes immunocompromised patients, causing acute and chronic infections. This bacterium can reside transiently inside cultured macrophages, but the contribution of the intramacrophic stage during infection remains unclear. MgtC and OprF have been identified as important bacterial factors when P. aeruginosa resides inside cultured macrophages. In this study, we showed that P. aeruginosa mgtC and oprF mutants, particular the latter one, had attenuated virulence in both mouse and zebrafish animal models of acute infection. To further investigate P. aeruginosa pathogenesis in zebrafish at a stage different from acute infection, we monitored bacterial load and visualized fluorescent bacteria in live larvae up to 4 days after infection. Whereas the attenuated phenotype of the oprF mutant was associated with a rapid elimination of bacteria, the mgtC mutant was able to persist at low level, a feature also observed with the wild-type strain in surviving larvae. Interestingly, these persistent bacteria can be visualized in macrophages of zebrafish. In a short-time infection model using a macrophage cell line, electron microscopy revealed that internalized P. aeruginosa wild-type bacteria were either released after macrophage lysis or remained intracellularly, where they were localized in vacuoles or in the cytoplasm. The mgtC mutant could also be detected inside macrophages, but without causing cell damage, whereas the oprF mutant was almost completely eliminated after phagocytosis, or localized in phagolysosomes. Taken together, our results show that the main role of OprF for intramacrophage survival impacts both acute and persistent infection by this bacterium. On the other hand, MgtC plays a clear role in acute infection but is not essential for bacterial persistence, in relation with the finding that the mgtC mutant is not completely eliminated by macrophages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.