Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38491033›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Plant-plant communication in Camellia japonica and C. rusticana via volatiles.

Yusuke Sakurai, Satomi Ishizaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yusuke SakuraiGraduate School of Science and Technology, Niigata University, Niigata, 950-2181, Japan.
Satomi IshizakiGraduate School of Science and Technology, Niigata University, Niigata, 950-2181, Japan. ishizaki@env.sc.niigata-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-5707-7805

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants emit volatile compounds when they are subjected to herbivorous, pathogenic, or artificial damages. Both the damaged plant and the neighboring intact plants induce resistance when they receive these volatiles, a phenomenon known as plant-plant communication. However, field observations of this phenomenon are limited. To understand the nature of plant-plant communication, we collected information about intra- and inter-plant signaling via volatiles in Camellia japonica and C. rusticana under natural conditions. We exposed intact branches of damaged plant (intra-plant) or neighboring plant (inter-plant) to artificially damaged plant volatiles (ADPVs). Leaf damage reduced in ADPVs-exposed branches in the neighboring plants compared to branches that were exposed to volatiles from intact leaves, thus, indicating that inter-plant signaling occur by the emission of volatiles from damaged leaves. We also conducted an air-transfer experiment wherein the headspace air of the damaged branch was transferred to the headspace of intact branches. Leaf damage reduced on the ADPVs-transferred branch compared to the control branch. The effect of volatiles on damage reduction lasted for three months. Our results indicate that ADPVs in Camellia species contain cues that induce resistance in neighboring plants. Our findings improve understanding of plant defense strategies that may be used in horticulture and agriculture.

Indexed as

CamelliaVolatile Organic CompoundsCommunicationHerbivoryPlantsSignal TransductionVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID38491033
PMCPMC10943193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.