ArticleScientific reports2024
Development of phenotyping algorithms for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and their application in more than 22,000 pregnant women.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between residential greenness and preeclampsia in Japan.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026Article
- Subtypes and onset of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and cardiovascular disease within 5 years after delivery.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- The spatial and contextual exposome and subtypes of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a double machine learning-based analysis.Exposome · 2026Article
- Child Developmental Patterns by Age 4 Years Across Subtypes of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Synergistic effects of cardiovascular health and social isolation on adverse pregnancy outcomes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Preeclampsia prediction with maternal and paternal polygenic risk scores: the TMM BirThree Cohort Study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Recently, many phenotyping algorithms for high-throughput cohort identification have been developed. Prospective genome cohort studies are critical resources for precision medicine, but there are many hurdles in the precise cohort identification. Consequently, it is important to develop phenotyping algorithms for cohort data collection. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. In this study, we developed, applied, and validated rule-based phenotyping algorithms of HDP. Two phenotyping algorithms, algorithms 1 and 2, were developed according to American and Japanese guidelines, and applied into 22,452 pregnant women in the Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study of the Tohoku Medical Megabank project. To precise cohort identification, we analyzed both structured data (e.g., laboratory and physiological tests) and unstructured clinical notes. The identified subtypes of HDP were validated against reference standards. Algorithms 1 and 2 identified 7.93% and 8.08% of the subjects as having HDP, respectively, along with their HDP subtypes. Our algorithms were high performing with high positive predictive values (0.96 and 0.90 for algorithms 1 and 2, respectively). Overcoming the hurdle of precise cohort identification from large-scale cohort data collection, we achieved both developed and implemented phenotyping algorithms, and precisely identified HDP patients and their subtypes from large-scale cohort data collection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.