Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38490746›Full record

ReviewJournal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology2024

Using design of experiments to guide genetic optimization of engineered metabolic pathways.

Seonyun Moon, Anna Saboe, Michael J Smanski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Seonyun MoonDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Anna SaboeBiotechnology Institute, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Michael J SmanskiDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55108, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6029-8326

Funding

University of Minnesota
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Design of experiments (DoE) is a term used to describe the application of statistical approaches to interrogate the impact of many variables on the performance of a multivariate system. It is commonly used for process optimization in fields such as chemical engineering and material science. Recent advances in the ability to quantitatively control the expression of genes in biological systems open up the possibility to apply DoE for genetic optimization. In this review targeted to genetic and metabolic engineers, we introduce several approaches in DoE at a high level and describe instances wherein these were applied to interrogate or optimize engineered genetic systems. We discuss the challenges of applying DoE and propose strategies to mitigate these challenges. ONE-SENTENCE SUMMARY: This is a review of literature related to applying Design of Experiments for genetic optimization.

Indexed as

Genetic EngineeringMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMetabolic EngineeringDesign of experimentsGene expressionMetabolic engineering

Identifiers

PMID38490746
PMCPMC10981448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.