Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38490280›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2024

State laws addressing teen dating violence in US high schools: A difference-in-differences study.

Avanti Adhia, Unmesha Roy Paladhi, Alice M Ellyson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Implementation of Teen Dating Violence Laws and Policies in High Schools: Staff and Student Perceptions.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Avanti AdhiaDepartment of Child, Family, and Population Health Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America. Electronic address: aadhia@uw.edu.
Unmesha Roy PaladhiDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Department of Global Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America. Electronic address: uroy@bwh.harvard.edu.
Alice M EllysonDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Center for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States of America. Electronic address: aellyson@uw.edu.

Funding

Assessing the impact and implementation of state laws for adolescent intimate partner violenceR00HD102567 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ADHIA, AVANTI B · 2022 to 2024
$723k
Assessing the impact and implementation of state laws for adolescent intimate partner violenceK99HD102567 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ADHIA, AVANTI B · 2020 to 2021
$253k
NICHD NIH HHS K99 HD102567NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD102567
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTeen dating violence (TDV) is prevalent with lifelong adverse consequences, and strategies to reduce its burden are needed. Many U.S. states have enacted laws to address TDV in schools, but few studies have examined their effectiveness. This study aimed to assess whether state TDV laws were associated with changes in physical TDV victimization among high school students.

methodsWe used repeated cross-sectional data of high school students from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey across 41 states from 1999 to 2019. Using a difference-in-differences approach with an event study design, we compared changes in past-year physical TDV in states that enacted TDV laws (n = 21) compared to states with no required laws (n = 20). Analyses accounted for clustering at the state-level and state and year-fixed effects. We conducted sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of our findings.

resultsIn our sample of 1,240,211 students, the prevalence of past-year physical TDV was 9.2% across all state-years. In 1999, the prevalence of TDV at the state-level ranged from 7.5 to 13.0%; in 2019, the prevalence ranged from 3.7 to 10.5%. There was no significant association between TDV laws and past-year physical TDV. Six or more waves after enactment, we observed a non-significant 1.7% percentage point reduction in TDV in states with TDV laws (95% CI: -3.6 to 0.3 percentage points; p = 0.10).

conclusionsWe found no significant association between enactment of TDV laws and physical TDV among high school students. Further research is needed to understand how TDV laws are implemented and components of TDV laws that may influence effectiveness.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorCrime VictimsIntimate Partner ViolenceSchoolsStudentsAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceState GovernmentSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesAdolescentsEducationLawsPolicy analysisTeen dating violence

Identifiers

PMID38490280
PMCPMC11039357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.