ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2024
Awake sternal fixation; comparison of technical details and early results with sternal fixation methods performed via general anaesthesia.
Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIsolated sternal fractures are rare pathologies that rarely require surgical fixation. Although different fixation techniques are used, it is routinely performed under general anaesthesia. In our study, we aimed to share the details of the awake sternal fixation technique performed in our clinic and to compare the early results with sternal fixation methods performed under general anaesthesia.
methodsBetween January 2009 and January 2023, 129 patients who were diagnosed with sternal fracture and who underwent investigations and follow-up in our clinic were evaluated retrospectively. Thirteen patients who underwent surgical fixation for isolated sternal fracture were included in the study. Patients were categorized according to fixation and anaesthetic technique; group 1: fixation with steel wire under general anaesthesia (n = 4), group 2: fixation with titanium plate-screw under general anaesthesia (n = 4) and group 3: fixation with awake titanium plate-screw with parasternal intercostal plane block (n = 5). Demographics, surgical indication, radiological findings, surgical incision, surgical time and hospital stay were statistically compared.
resultsThe mean age of the patients included in the study was 55.15 ± 15.01 years and 84.6% (n = 11) were male. The most common reason for fixation was displaced fracture (53.8%). Fixation surgery was performed due to pain in 30.8% (n = 4) and non-union in 15.4% (n = 2) of the fractures. The mean duration of surgery were 98.75 ± 16.52, 77.5 ± 35 and 41 ± 14.74 min, respectively. Duration of surgery was significantly lower in group 3 compared to the other groups (P = 0.012). The hospital stay duration for group 1 was 6 days, group 2 was 4 days and group 3 was 1 day. A notable difference was observed among all groups (P = 0.019).
conclusionsAwake sternal fixation technique with titanium plate-screw system under superficial parasternal intercostal plane block is an easy and effective method for surgical treatment of isolated sternal fractures. This technique showed a direct positive effect on the duration of surgery and hospital stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.