Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38490223›Full record

ReviewScience progress

A bibliometric literature review of stock price forecasting: From statistical model to deep learning approach.

Pham Hoang Vuong, Lam Hung Phu, Tran Hong Van Nguyen, Le Nhat Duy, Pham The Bao, Tan Dat Trinh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pham Hoang VuongInformation Science Faculty, Sai Gon University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Lam Hung PhuInformation Science Faculty, Sai Gon University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Tran Hong Van NguyenFaculty of Finance and Banking, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Le Nhat DuyFaculty of Information Technology, Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Pham The BaoInformation Science Faculty, Sai Gon University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Tan Dat TrinhInformation Science Faculty, Sai Gon University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0003-0443-612X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We introduce a comprehensive analysis of several approaches used in stock price forecasting, including statistical, machine learning, and deep learning models. The advantages and limitations of these models are discussed to provide an insight into stock price forecasting. Traditional statistical methods, such as the autoregressive integrated moving average and its variants, are recognized for their efficiency, but they also have some limitations in addressing non-linear problems and providing long-term forecasts. Machine learning approaches, including algorithms such as artificial neural networks and random forests, are praised for their ability to grasp non-linear information without depending on stochastic data or economic theory. Moreover, deep learning approaches, such as convolutional neural networks and recurrent neural networks, can deal with complex patterns in stock prices. Additionally, this study further investigates hybrid models, combining various approaches to explore their strengths and counterbalance individual weaknesses, thereby enhancing predictive accuracy. By presenting a detailed review of various studies and methods, this study illuminates the direction of stock price forecasting and highlights potential approaches for further studies refining the stock price forecasting models.

Indexed as

Autoregressive integrated moving averagedeep learninghybrid modelmachine learningstock price forecasting

Identifiers

PMID38490223
PMCPMC10943735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.