Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38490163›Full record

ArticleScience progress

Characterization and

Asma Ashraf, Saima Qadeer, Sana Ullah, Muhammad Asad, Huma Fatima, Muhammad Farhan Nasir, Nargis Shaheen, Naveeda Akhtar Qureshi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Asma AshrafDepartment of Zoology, Division of Science and Technology, University of Education, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-9420-1262
Saima QadeerDepartment of Zoology, Division of Science and Technology, University of Education, Lahore, Pakistan.
Sana UllahDepartment of Zoology, Division of Science and Technology, University of Education, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-9840-3988
Muhammad AsadDepartment of Zoology, Division of Science and Technology, University of Education, Lahore, Pakistan.
Huma FatimaDepartment of Zoology, Women University Mardan, Mardan, Pakistan.
Muhammad Farhan NasirDepartment of Zoology, Division of Science and Technology, University of Education, Lahore, Pakistan.
Nargis ShaheenDepartment of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Biological Science, Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Naveeda Akhtar QureshiDepartment of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Biological Science, Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan.
University of Okara · PKQuaid-i-Azam University · PKThe Women University Multan · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Termites cause a serious menace to wooden structures all over the world. They rely mostly on entozoic fauna residing in their hindgut for the digestion of cellulosic and hemicellulosic materials. One of the ways to control termites is through their gut symbionts. The present study was designed to characterize the hindgut bacteria isolated from

Indexed as

IsopteraAnimalsBacteriaBiodiversityPlant ExtractsPlant Extractsbiochemical characterizationgrowth inhibitory effectsgut symbiontsplants extracttermite infestation

Identifiers

PMID38490163
PMCPMC10943747
OpenAlexW4392869092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.