Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38489588›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2024

Calling Structural Variants with Confidence from Short-Read Data in Wild Bird Populations.

Gabriel David, Alicia Bertolotti, Ryan Layer, Douglas Scofield, Alexander Hayward, Tobias Baril, Hamish A Burnett, Erik Gudmunds, Henrik Jensen, Arild Husby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gabriel DavidDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0007-2935-3335
Alicia BertolottiSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Ryan LayerBioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5823-3232
Douglas ScofieldDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Alexander HaywardCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7413-718X
Tobias BarilCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5936-7531
Hamish A BurnettCentre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Erik GudmundsDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Henrik JensenCentre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7804-1564
Arild HusbyDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1911-8351

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comprehensive characterization of structural variation in natural populations has only become feasible in the last decade. To investigate the population genomic nature of structural variation, reproducible and high-confidence structural variation callsets are first required. We created a population-scale reference of the genome-wide landscape of structural variation across 33 Nordic house sparrows (Passer domesticus). To produce a consensus callset across all samples using short-read data, we compare heuristic-based quality filtering and visual curation (Samplot/PlotCritic and Samplot-ML) approaches. We demonstrate that curation of structural variants is important for reducing putative false positives and that the time invested in this step outweighs the potential costs of analyzing short-read-discovered structural variation data sets that include many potential false positives. We find that even a lenient manual curation strategy (e.g. applied by a single curator) can reduce the proportion of putative false positives by up to 80%, thus enriching the proportion of high-confidence variants. Crucially, in applying a lenient manual curation strategy with a single curator, nearly all (>99%) variants rejected as putative false positives were also classified as such by a more stringent curation strategy using three additional curators. Furthermore, variants rejected by manual curation failed to reflect the expected population structure from SNPs, whereas variants passing curation did. Combining heuristic-based quality filtering with rapid manual curation of structural variants in short-read data can therefore become a time- and cost-effective first step for functional and population genomic studies requiring high-confidence structural variation callsets.

Indexed as

GenomeGenomicsMetagenomicsPolymorphism, Single Nucleotidecuration strategieshigh-confidence variantsputative false positivesrapid manual curationshort readsstructural variation

Identifiers

PMID38489588
PMCPMC11018544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.