Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38489375›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2024

Quantitative evaluation model of variable diagnosis for chest X-ray images using deep learning.

Shota Nakagawa, Naoaki Ono, Yukichika Hakamata, Takashi Ishii, Akira Saito, Shintaro Yanagimoto, Shigehiko Kanaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shota NakagawaDepartment of Science and Technology, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Nara, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6408-1387
Naoaki OnoDepartment of Science and Technology, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Nara, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7722-055X
Yukichika HakamataDivision for Health Service Promotion, the University of Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi IshiiDivision for Health Service Promotion, the University of Tokyo, Japan.
Akira SaitoDivision for Health Service Promotion, the University of Tokyo, Japan.
Shintaro YanagimotoDivision for Health Service Promotion, the University of Tokyo, Japan.
Shigehiko KanayaDepartment of Science and Technology, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Nara, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the use of a deep learning model in quantitatively evaluating clinical findings typically subject to uncertain evaluations by physicians, using binary test results based on routine protocols. A chest X-ray is the most commonly used diagnostic tool for the detection of a wide range of diseases and is generally performed as a part of regular medical checkups. However, when it comes to findings that can be classified as within the normal range but are not considered disease-related, the thresholds of physicians' findings can vary to some extent, therefore it is necessary to define a new evaluation method and quantify it. The implementation of such methods is difficult and expensive in terms of time and labor. In this study, a total of 83,005 chest X-ray images were used to diagnose the common findings of pleural thickening and scoliosis. A novel method for quantitatively evaluating the probability that a physician would judge the images to have these findings was established. The proposed method successfully quantified the variation in physicians' findings using a deep learning model trained only on binary annotation data. It was also demonstrated that the developed method could be applied to both transfer learning using convolutional neural networks for general image analysis and a newly learned deep learning model based on vector quantization variational autoencoders with high correlations ranging from 0.89 to 0.97.

Identifiers

PMID38489375
PMCPMC10942047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.