Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38489348›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2024

Bayesian inference of relative fitness on high-throughput pooled competition assays.

Manuel Razo-Mejia, Madhav Mani, Dmitri Petrov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Manuel Razo-MejiaDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9510-0527
Madhav ManiNSF-Simons Center for Quantitative Biology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Dmitri PetrovDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.

Funding

Genomics of rapid adaptation in the lab and in the wildR35GM118165 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Dmitri Petrov · 2016 to 2026
$8.3M
Genetic Determinants of Tumor Growth and Drug Sensitivity in EGFR Mutant Lung CancerR01CA263715 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI POLITI, KATERINA ABIGAIL, WINSLOW, MONTE MEIER · 2021 to 2025
$2.8M
Genetic analysis of aging on immune responses to lung cancerU01AG077922 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WINSLOW, MONTE MEIER · 2021 to 2025
$2.5M
Genetic dissection of oncogenic Kras signalingR01CA230025 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WINSLOW, MONTE MEIER · 2021 to 2025
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA230025NCI NIH HHS R01 CA263715NIA NIH HHS U01 AG077922NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tracking of lineage frequencies via DNA barcode sequencing enables the quantification of microbial fitness. However, experimental noise coming from biotic and abiotic sources complicates the computation of a reliable inference. We present a Bayesian pipeline to infer relative microbial fitness from high-throughput lineage tracking assays. Our model accounts for multiple sources of noise and propagates uncertainties throughout all parameters in a systematic way. Furthermore, using modern variational inference methods based on automatic differentiation, we are able to scale the inference to a large number of unique barcodes. We extend this core model to analyze multi-environment assays, replicate experiments, and barcodes linked to genotypes. On simulations, our method recovers known parameters within posterior credible intervals. This work provides a generalizable Bayesian framework to analyze lineage tracking experiments. The accompanying open-source software library enables the adoption of principled statistical methods in experimental evolution.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Screening AssaysSoftwareBayes TheoremGene LibrarySequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID38489348
PMCPMC10971673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.