Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38489311›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Testing a faith-placed education intervention for bowel cancer screening in Muslim communities using a two-group non-randomised mixed-methods approach: Feasibility study protocol.

Marimba Carr, Claire Thompson, Tara Berger-Gillam, Joanne Freedman, Nigel Smeeton, Salman Waqar, Daksha Trivedi

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marimba CarrScreening and Immunisations Team, NHS England and Improvement, East of England, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8357-5963
Claire ThompsonCentre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Tara Berger-GillamNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Joanne FreedmanScreening and Immunisations Team, NHS England and Improvement, East of England, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7840-473X
Nigel SmeetonCentre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9460-5411
Salman WaqarNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7886-873X
Daksha TrivediCentre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
University of Hertfordshire · GBHertfordshire Community NHS Trust · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

National Institute of Health Research (NIHR)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInequalities exist in uptake of bowel cancer screening in England with low uptake in areas with high deprivation and amongst certain ethnic and religious groups. Individuals from these groups are more likely to receive a late diagnosis of bowel cancer. Uptake in Muslim communities, for example, has been shown to be lower than in the general population. Culturally adapted interventions are needed to address these inequalities. This feasibility study aims to assess the acceptability and accessibility of an educational faith-placed bowel cancer screening intervention in the East of England, alongside its impact on bowel screening uptake. It was developed by the British Islamic Medical Association in partnership with community stakeholders and professionals.

methodsEthical approval was granted on the 27 October 2021, REC reference number 21/EE/0231. A two-group non-randomised feasibility mixed methods study will be conducted, using surveys, focus groups and semi-structured interviews. Participants eligible for bowel screening will be recruited through local mosques and community venues. We aim to recruit 100 participants to the intervention group and 150 to the comparison group (not receiving the intervention). Intervention group participants will complete a survey at baseline, post-intervention and at six-month follow up. Comparison group participants will complete a survey at baseline and at six-month follow up. Outcomes will include: intention to take up screening; actual screening uptake; knowledge, attitudes, barriers and facilitators towards screening. Regional screening hub records will be used to ascertain actual screening uptake at six-month follow-up. Quantitative survey data will be summarised using descriptive statistics (e.g., proportion), and exploratory univariate analysis will be undertaken (e.g., chi-squared test). Two focus group interviews will be conducted with intervention group participants (with up to 16 participants). Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with 10 clinicians delivering the intervention to explore the acceptability of the intervention, training, and delivery. All qualitative data will be subject to a general inductive analysis. DISCUSSION: The findings will inform how faith-placed interventions can be implemented to increase uptake of bowel cancer screening, and potentially other health promotion programmes, to address health inequalities in ethnically diverse communities in England.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsIslamEarly Detection of CancerFeasibility StudiesHealth PromotionHumansNon-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID38489311
PMCPMC10942091
OpenAlexW4392857321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.