ArticlePLoS computational biology2024
For long-term sustainable software in bioinformatics.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Do papers tell the whole story? A benchmark and framework for uncovering hidden implementation gaps in bioinformatics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Ten quick tips to SNIFF out sustainable and secure scientific software.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Towards accurate genomic detection of fungal antimicrobial resistance: progress in fungal resistance databases and bioinformatic tools.Microbial genomics · 2026Review
- CODE beyond FAIR: a roadmap for reusable research software.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Ten common misconceptions about Galaxy (and why they are wrong!).PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- BiG-SCAPE 2.0 and BiG-SLiCE 2.0: scalable, accurate and interactive sequence clustering of metabolic gene clusters.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Galaxy single-cell & spatial omics community update: Navigating new frontiers in 2025.Cell genomics · 2025Review
- MORE interpretable multi-omic regulatory networks to characterise phenotypes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.