ArticlePloS one2024
Upregulation of Nrf2 in myocardial infarction and ischemia-reperfusion injury of the heart.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardioprotective Effects ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Fasciola hepatica-Derived Proteins Shield the Heart From Type 2 Myocardial Infarction in Rats by Modulating Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Imbalance: Insights Relevant to the Hygiene Hypothesis.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2026Article
- Cardiomyocyte Glucocorticoid Receptors Exacerbate Stress Effects in Myocardial Ischemia Injury in Mice.Cells · 2025Article
- Attenuation of cerebral ischemia-reperfusion induced neurotoxicity by telmisartan, ertugliflozin, and omaveloxolone through Nrf2/HO-1 pathway modulation: In vivo and in silico insights.Toxicology reports · 2025Article
- Cardioprotective Potential of ApoE-Derived Peptide (ApoEFrag) in Myocardial Infarction in Rats: A Mechanistic Study.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myocardial infarction (MI) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the world and is characterized by ischemic necrosis of an area of the myocardium permanently devoid of blood supply. During reperfusion, reactive oxygen species are released and this causes further insult to the myocardium, resulting in ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury. Since Nrf2 is a key regulator of redox balance, it is essential to determine its contribution to these two disease processes. Conventionally Nrf2 levels have been shown to rise immediately after ischemia and reperfusion but its contribution to disease process a week after the injury remains uncertain. Mice were divided into MI, IR injury, and sham surgery groups and were sacrificed 1 week after surgery. Infarct was visualized using H&E and trichrome staining and expression of Nrf2 was assessed using immunohistochemistry, Western blot, and ELISA. MI displayed a higher infarct size than the IR group (MI: 31.02 ± 1.45%, IR: 13.03 ± 2.57%; p < 0.01). We observed a significantly higher expression of Nrf2 in the MI group compared to the IR model using immunohistochemistry, spot densitometry of Western blot (MI: 2.22 ± 0.16, IR: 1.81 ± 0.10, Sham: 1.52 ± 0.13; p = 0.001) and ELISA (MI: 80.78 ± 27.08, IR: 31.97 ± 4.35; p < 0.01). There is a significantly higher expression of Nrf2 in MI compared to the IR injury group. Modulation of Nrf2 could be a potential target for therapeutics in the future, and its role in cardioprotection can be further investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.