Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38489116›Full record

ArticleApplied biochemistry and biotechnology2024

The Potential of Fish Protein Hydrolysate Supplementation in Nile Tilapia Diets: Effects on Growth and Health Performance, Disease Resistance, and Farm Economic Analysis.

Muhammad Anamul Kabir, Shishir Kumar Nandi, Afrina Yeasmin Suma, Zulhisyam Abdul Kari, Suniza Anis Mohamad Sukri, Lee Seong Wei, Abdullah Al Mamun, Paul Seguin, Mikael Herault, Martina Irwan Khoo and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Feeding Habits of Narrow-Clawed CrayfishAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Muhammad Anamul KabirDepartment of Aquaculture, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet, 3100, Bangladesh. anamul.aq@sau.ac.bd.
Shishir Kumar NandiDepartment of Aquaculture, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet, 3100, Bangladesh.
Afrina Yeasmin SumaDepartment of Aquaculture, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet, 3100, Bangladesh.
Zulhisyam Abdul KariDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agro-Based Industry, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Jeli Campus, Jeli, Kelantan, 17600, Malaysia. zulhisyam.a@umk.edu.my.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3160-7839
Suniza Anis Mohamad SukriDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agro-Based Industry, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Jeli Campus, Jeli, Kelantan, 17600, Malaysia.
Lee Seong WeiDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agro-Based Industry, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Jeli Campus, Jeli, Kelantan, 17600, Malaysia.
Abdullah Al MamunDepartment of Fish Health Management, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet, 3100, Bangladesh.
Paul SeguinSymrise Aqua Feed of Taste, Nutrition & Health Segment of the Symrise AG group, Clichy, 92110, France.
Mikael HeraultSymrise Aqua Feed of Taste, Nutrition & Health Segment of the Symrise AG group, Clichy, 92110, France.
Martina Irwan KhooDepartment of Chemical Pathology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu 16150, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Guillermo Téllez-IsaíasDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, 72701, USA.
Sylhet Agricultural University · BDUniversiti Malaysia Kelantan · MYHospital Universiti Sains Malaysia · MYUniversity of Arkansas at Fayetteville · US

Funding

Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) R/FRGS/A0700/00778A/003/2022/01076Symrise Aqua Feed research grant Symrise Aqua Feed research grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fish protein hydrolysate (FPH) has shown immense potential as a dietary protein supplement and immunostimulant in aquaculture, especially in Nile tilapia production. Four isoproteic diets (30% crude protein) were prepared by including FPH at varying percentages (0%, 0.5%, 1%, and 2%). Nile tilapia fed with FPH diets for 90 days, and their growth performance, feed utilization, blood biochemistry, liver and gut morphology, and resistance against Streptococcus iniae were investigated. The findings revealed that diets physical attributes such as pellet durability index and water stability were remarkably (p < 0.05) varied between experimental diet groups. Furthermore, the test diets were more palatable when FPH was included at 1% and 2%. Fish that were fed with a 2% FPH-treated diet had significantly (p < 0.05) greater growth indices than other treatments. Additionally, their feed utilization was significantly (p < 0.05) improved. The experimental diets and intestinal total bacteria count (TBC) exhibited a rising trend with FPH levels, where the 2% FPH-treated diet recorded the highest TBC. Neutrophil (10

Indexed as

Animal FeedCichlidsDietary SupplementsDisease ResistanceProtein HydrolysatesAnimalsAquacultureFish DiseasesFish ProteinsFish ProteinsProtein HydrolysatesBacterial challengeFish protein hydrolysateGrowth performanceHealth statusNile tilapiaSustainable aquaculture

Identifiers

PMID38489116
OpenAlexW4392852258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.