Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38488994›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2024

Multiple surgical resections for progressive IDH wildtype glioblastoma-is it beneficial?

Susan Isabel Honeyman, William J Owen, Juan Mier, Katya Marks, Sohani N Dassanyake, Matthew J Wood, Rory Fairhead, Pablo Martinez-Soler, Hussain Jasem, Ananya Yarlagadda and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susan Isabel HoneymanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK. susan.honeyman@ouh.nhs.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5117-9405
William J OwenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Juan MierDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Katya MarksDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Sohani N DassanyakeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Matthew J WoodDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Rory FairheadDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Pablo Martinez-SolerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Hussain JasemDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Ananya YarlagaddaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Joy R RoachDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Alexandros BoukasDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Richard StaceyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Vasileios ApostolopoulosDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Puneet PlahaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe role of repeat resection for recurrent glioblastoma (rGB) remains equivocal. This study aims to assess the overall survival and complications rates of single or repeat resection for rGB.

methodsA single-centre retrospective review of all patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma managed surgically, between January 2014 and January 2022, was carried out. Patient survival and factors influencing prognosis were analysed, using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods.

resultsFour hundred thirty-two patients were included, of whom 329 underwent single resection, 83 had two resections and 20 patients underwent three resections. Median OS (mOS) in the cohort who underwent a single operation was 13.7 months (95% CI: 12.7-14.7 months). The mOS was observed to be extended in patients who underwent second or third-time resection, at 22.9 months and 44.7 months respectively (p < 0.001). On second operation achieving > 95% resection or residual tumour volume of < 2.25 cc was significantly associated with prolonged survival. There was no significant difference in overall complication rates between primary versus second (p = 0.973) or third-time resections (p = 0.312). The use of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) guided resection was associated with reduced post-operative neurological deficit (RR 0.37, p = 0.002), as was use of intraoperative ultrasound (iUSS) (RR 0.45, p = 0.04).

conclusionsThis study demonstrates potential prolongation of survival for rGB patients undergoing repeat resection, without significant increase in complication rates with repeat resections. Achieving a more complete repeat resection improved survival. Moreover, the use of intraoperative imaging adjuncts can maximise tumour resection, whilst minimising the risk of neurological deficit.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaDiffusion Tensor ImagingHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRetrospective StudiesGlioblastomaRecurrentRepeatSurgical resection

Identifiers

PMID38488994
PMCPMC10943163
OpenAlexW4392863324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.