Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38488972›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Diffusion-/perfusion-weighted imaging fusion to automatically identify stroke within 4.5 h.

Liang Jiang, Jiarui Sun, Yajing Wang, Haodi Yang, Yu-Chen Chen, Mingyang Peng, Hong Zhang, Yang Chen, Xindao Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Liang Jiang *Department of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210006, China.
Jiarui Sun *Laboratory of Image Science and Technology, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210096, China.
Yajing WangDepartment of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210006, China.
Haodi YangLaboratory of Image Science and Technology, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210096, China.
Yu-Chen ChenDepartment of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210006, China.
Mingyang PengDepartment of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210006, China.
Hong ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210000, China.
Yang ChenLaboratory of Image Science and Technology, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210096, China. chenyang.list@seu.edu.cn.
Xindao YinDepartment of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210006, China. y.163yy@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6958-5201

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82202128the Jiangsu Provincial Special Program of Medical Science No. BE2021604The Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province No. BK20201118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe aimed to develop machine learning (ML) models based on diffusion- and perfusion-weighted imaging fusion (DP fusion) for identifying stroke within 4.5 h, to compare them with DWI- and/or PWI-based ML models, and to construct an automatic segmentation-classification model and compare with manual labeling methods.

methodsML models were developed from multimodal MRI datasets of acute stroke patients within 24 h of clear symptom onset from two centers. The processes included manual segmentation, registration, DP fusion, feature extraction, and model establishment (logistic regression (LR) and support vector machine (SVM)). A segmentation-classification model (X-Net) was proposed for automatically identifying stroke within 4.5 h. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, Dice coefficients, decision curve analysis, and calibration curves were used to evaluate model performance.

resultsA total of 418 patients (≤ 4.5 h: 214; > 4.5 h: 204) were evaluated. The DP fusion model achieved the highest AUC in identifying the onset time in the training (LR: 0.95; SVM: 0.92) and test sets (LR: 0.91; SVM: 0.90). The DP fusion-LR model displayed consistent positive and greater net benefits than other models across a broad range of risk thresholds. The calibration curve demonstrated the good calibration of the DP fusion-LR model (average absolute error: 0.049). The X-Net model obtained the highest Dice coefficients (DWI: 0.81; Tmax: 0.83) and achieved similar performance to manual labeling (AUC: 0.84).

conclusionsThe automatic segmentation-classification models based on DWI and PWI fusion images had high performance in identifying stroke within 4.5 h. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) fusion images had high performance in identifying stroke within 4.5 h. The automatic segmentation-classification models based on DWI and PWI fusion images could provide clinicians with decision-making guidance for acute stroke patients with unknown onset time. KEY POINTS: • The diffusion/perfusion-weighted imaging fusion model had the best performance in identifying stroke within 4.5 h. • The X-Net model had the highest Dice and achieved performance close to manual labeling in segmenting lesions of acute stroke. • The automatic segmentation-classification model based on DP fusion images performed well in identifying stroke within 4.5 h.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingMachine LearningStrokeAgedFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingSensitivity and SpecificityTime FactorsDiffusion-weighted imagingOnset timePerfusion-weighted imagingSegmentation and classificationStroke

Identifiers

PMID38488972
PMCPMC11399198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.