Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38488901›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2024

Radiotherapy in localized prostate cancer: a multicenter analysis evaluating tumor control and late toxicity after brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy in 1293 patients.

Matthias Moll, Elisabeth Nechvile, Christian Kirisits, Oxana Komina, Thomas Pajer, Bettina Kohl, Marcin Miszczyk, Joachim Widder, Tomas-Hendrik Knocke-Abulesz, Gregor Goldner

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Protocol-based CT-guided brachytherapy for patients with prostate cancer and previous rectal extirpation-a curative approach.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthias MollDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Matthias.moll@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0001-5523-8866
Elisabeth NechvileDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinik Hietzing, Vienna, Austria.
Christian KirisitsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Oxana KominaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinik Hietzing, Vienna, Austria.
Thomas PajerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinik Hietzing, Vienna, Austria.
Bettina KohlDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinik Hietzing, Vienna, Austria.
Marcin MiszczykDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Joachim WidderDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Tomas-Hendrik Knocke-AbuleszDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinik Hietzing, Vienna, Austria.
Gregor GoldnerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna · ATKlinik Hietzing · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeComparing oncological outcomes and toxicity after primary treatment of localized prostate cancer using HDR- or LDR-mono-brachytherapy (BT), or conventionally (CF) or moderately hypofractionated (HF) external beam radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsRetrospectively, patients with low- (LR) or favorable intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer treated between 03/2000 and 09/2022 in two centers were included. Treatment was performed using either CF with total doses between 74 and 78 Gy, HF with 2.4-2.6 Gy per fraction in 30 fractions, or LDR- or HDR-BT. Biochemical control (BC) according to the Phoenix criteria, and late gastrointestinal (GI), and genitourinary (GU) toxicity according to RTOG/EORTC criteria were assessed.

resultsWe identified 1293 patients, 697 with LR and 596 with IR prostate cancer. Of these, 470, 182, 480, and 161 were treated with CF, HF, LDR-BT, and HDR-BT, respectively. For BC, we did not find a significant difference between treatments in LR and IR (p = 0.31 and 0.72). The 5‑year BC for LR was between 93 and 95% for all treatment types. For IR, BC was between 88% in the CF and 94% in the HF group. For CF and HF, maximum GI and GU toxicity grade ≥ 2 was between 22 and 27%. For LDR-BT, we observed 67% grade ≥ 2 GU toxicity. Maximum GI grade ≥ 2 toxicity was 9%. For HDR-BT, we observed 1% GI grade ≥ 2 toxicity and 19% GU grade ≥ 2 toxicity.

conclusionAll types of therapy were effective and well received. HDR-BT caused the least late toxicities, especially GI.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyProstatic NeoplasmsRadiation InjuriesAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiation Dose HypofractionationRadiotherapy DosageRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAustriaHDRIntermediate-riskLDRLow-risk

Identifiers

PMID38488901
PMCPMC11272802
OpenAlexW4392849776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.