Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38488899›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2024

Assessment and validation of glottic motion using cone-beam CT and real-time cine MRI.

Seok-Joo Chun, Jaeman Son, Seonghee Kang, Chang Heon Choi, Jung-In Kim, Young-Il Kim, Joo Ho Lee, Jin Ho Kim, Hong-Gyun Wu

Open access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Seok-Joo ChunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, 03080, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea (Republic of).
Jaeman SonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, 03080, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea (Republic of).
Seonghee KangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, 03080, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea (Republic of).
Chang Heon ChoiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, 03080, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea (Republic of).
Jung-In KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, 03080, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea (Republic of).
Young-Il KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sejong Chungnam National University Hospital, Sejong, Korea (Republic of).
Joo Ho LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, 03080, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea (Republic of).
Jin Ho KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, 03080, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea (Republic of).
Hong-Gyun WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, 03080, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea (Republic of). wuhg@snu.ac.kr.
National Medical Center · KRSeoul National University · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KRCancer Research Institute · USChungnam National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to assess the margin for the planning target volume (PTV) using the Van Herk formula. We then validated the proposed margin by real-time magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

methodsAn analysis of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) data from early glottic cancer patients was performed to evaluate organ motion. Deformed clinical target volumes (CTV) after rigid registration were acquired using the Velocity program (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Systematic (Σ) and random errors (σ) were evaluated. The margin for the PTV was defined as 2.5 Σ + 0.7 σ according to the Van Herk formula. To validate this margin, we accrued healthy volunteers. Sagittal real-time cine MRI was conducted using the ViewRay system (ViewRay Inc., Oakwood Village, OH, USA). Within the obtained sagittal images, the vocal cord was delineated. The movement of the vocal cord was summed up and considered as the internal target volume (ITV). We then assessed the degree of overlap between the ITV and the PTV (vocal cord plus margins) by calculating the volume overlap ratio, represented as (ITV∩PTV)/ITV.

resultsCBCTs of 17 early glottic patients were analyzed. Σ and σ were 0.55 and 0.57 for left-right (LR), 0.70 and 0.60 for anterior-posterior (AP), and 1.84 and 1.04 for superior-inferior (SI), respectively. The calculated margin was 1.8 mm (LR), 2.2 mm (AP), and 5.3 mm (SI). Four healthy volunteers participated for validation. A margin of 3 mm (AP) and 5 mm (SI) was applied to the vocal cord as the PTV. The average volume overlap ratio between ITV and PTV was 0.92 (range 0.85-0.99) without swallowing and 0.77 (range 0.70-0.88) with swallowing.

conclusionBy evaluating organ motion by using CBCT, the margin was 1.8 (LR), 2.2 (AP), and 5.3 mm (SI). The margin acquired using CBCT fitted well in real-time cine MRI. Given that swallowing during radiotherapy can result in a substantial displacement, it is crucial to consider strategies aimed at minimizing swallowing and related motion.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyGlottisLaryngeal NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineAdultAgedComputer SystemsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrgan MotionRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityCone-beam CTGlottic cancerPTV marginRadiotherapyViewRayVocal cord

Identifiers

PMID38488899
PMCPMC11039518
OpenAlexW4392849773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.