ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2024
Evaluation of eGFR methods in a sub-Saharan African community-based pediatric population.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of eGFR equations for estimating kidney function in Chinese children.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Risks, Diagnostic Thresholds, and Outcomes of Pediatric CKD in Rural Africa.Kidney international reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate assessment of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) plays a pivotal role in the early detection, management, and optimal medication dosing for chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, validation of eGFR, utilizing cystatin C-based equations, is limited in African children and adolescents with CKD. We evaluate the agreement of eGFR equations incorporating both cystatin C and creatinine in this specific population.
methodsThis community-based study assessed CKD in children (2-15 years) using cystatin C and serum creatinine. eGFR agreement with the reference was evaluated with Bland-Altman plots, ROC curves, and Lin's CCC, using the Under-25 serum creatinine-cystatin C equation as the reference standard. Pairwise ROC comparisons assess the statistical differences in estimation equation agreement.
resultsAmong 666 children (mean age, 7.8 ± 3.8 years; 48.6% male), CKD prevalence was 11.6% (95% CI, 9.2-14.2%). Notably, the Chehade equation, using combined biomarkers, aligned best with the reference, displaying the lowest mean deviation (- 0.59; 95% CI, - 1.19 to 0.01), superior agreement (P10, 91.0%; P30, 96.70%), and highest discriminatory power (0.989). In contrast, CKD-EPI 2012 cystatin C had the highest mean deviation (- 35.90) and lowest discriminatory power (0.79). Equations combining creatinine and cystatin C (Schwartz, Chehade, Full Age Spectrum) demonstrated strong positive Lin's CCC with CKiD U25 creatinine-cystatin C, while Bouvet showed a notably weak correlation (Lin's CCC, 0.22).
conclusionIn African children with CKD, the Chehade, CKiD Under 25 creatinine-based equations, and the Full Age Spectrum equations show promise for CKD diagnosis. However, a measured GFR is essential to identifying the most accurate eGFR equation in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.