ArticleInternational ophthalmology2024
Clinical profile and challenges faced in the management of optic neuritis: the Indian scenario.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- The evolving role of interventional radiology in ophthalmology: advancements in imaging, therapeutic applications, and future prospects, a narrative review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Patient profiles and disease characteristics of the IMSRN cohort: a multicentre study (2021-2025).The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOptic neuritis (ON) is a relatively common ophthalmic disease that has recently received renewed attention owing to immunological breakthroughs. We studied the profile of patients with ON with special reference to antibody-mediated ON and the challenges faced in its management.
methodsCase records of patients with ON presenting to a tertiary eye-care center in South India were analyzed. Data on demographics, presenting visual acuity (VA), clinical features, seropositivity for aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein immunoglobulin G (MOG-IgG), details of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of orbits and brain, and treatment were collected.
resultsAmong 138 cases with acute ON, male: female ratio was 1:2. Isolated ON was present in 41.3% of cases. Antibody testing of sera was performed in 68 patients only due to financial limitations. Among these, 48.5% were MOG-IgG-seropositive, 11.76% were AQP4-IgG-seropositive, and 30.88% samples were double seronegative. Other causes included multiple sclerosis (n = 4), lactational ON (n = 4), tuberculosis (n = 2), invasive perineuritis (n = 2), COVID-19 vaccination (n = 2), and COVID-19 (n = 1). The mean presenting best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 1.31 ± 1.16 logMAR (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution). The mean BCVA at 3 months was 0.167 ± 0.46 logMAR. Only initial VA ≤ 'Counting fingers' (CF) had a significant association with the visual outcome for final VA worse than CF. The steep cost of investigations and treatment posed challenges for many patients in the management of ON.
conclusionMOG-IgG-associated ON is common in India. Unfortunately, financial constraints delay the diagnosis and timely management of ON, adversely affecting the outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.