Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38488846›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

The EMPOWER Occupational e-Mental Health Intervention Implementation Checklist to Foster e-Mental Health Interventions in the Workplace: Development Study.

Alberto Raggi, Renaldo M Bernard, Claudia Toppo, Carla Sabariego, Luis Salvador Carulla, Sue Lukersmith, Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen, Dorota Merecz-Kot, Beatriz Olaya, Rodrigo Antunes Lima and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07199387 (PeerOnCall), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07199387 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

PeerOnCall: A Cluster Randomized Trial of a Peer Support Mobile Health Platform in Canadian Fire Service Organizations

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled2,000ConditionsFirefightersArmsApp Users (Structured Implementation), App Users (Standard Implementation)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. PeerOnCall: Evaluating Implementation of App-Based Peer Support in Canadian Public Safety Organizations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Alberto RaggiNeurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7433-7779
Renaldo M BernardSwiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6958-3369
Claudia ToppoNeurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1312-6679
Carla SabariegoSwiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6946-0177
Luis Salvador CarullaHealth Research Institute, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5742-9866
Sue LukersmithHealth Research Institute, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8202-3828
Leona Hakkaart-van RoijenErasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0635-7388
Dorota Merecz-KotInstitute of Psychology, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8294-4309
Beatriz OlayaResearch, Innovation and Teaching Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2046-3929
Rodrigo Antunes LimaResearch, Innovation and Teaching Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7778-2616
Desirée Gutiérrez-MarínResearch, Innovation and Teaching Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7567-5000
Ellen VorstenboschSwiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1054-6587
Chiara CuratoliNeurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-8951-1504
Martina CacciatoreNeurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3379-6725

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOccupational e-mental health (OeMH) interventions significantly reduce the burden of mental health conditions. The successful implementation of OeMH interventions is influenced by many implementation strategies, barriers, and facilitators across contexts, which, however, are not systematically tracked. One of the reasons is that international consensus on documenting and reporting the implementation of OeMH interventions is lacking. There is a need for practical guidance on the key factors influencing the implementation of interventions that organizations should consider. Stakeholder consultations secure a valuable source of information about these key strategies, barriers, and facilitators that are relevant to successful implementation of OeMH interventions.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to develop a brief checklist to guide the implementation of OeMH interventions.

methodsBased on the results of a recently published systematic review, we drafted a comprehensive checklist with a wide set of strategies, barriers, and facilitators that were identified as relevant for the implementation of OeMH interventions. We then used a 2-stage stakeholder consultation process to refine the draft checklist to a brief and practical checklist comprising key implementation factors. In the first stage, stakeholders evaluated the relevance and feasibility of items on the draft checklist using a web-based survey. The list of items comprised 12 facilitators presented as statements addressing "elements that positively affect implementation" and 17 barriers presented as statements addressing "concerns toward implementation." If a strategy was deemed relevant, respondents were asked to rate it using a 4-point Likert scale ranging from "very difficult to implement" to "very easy to implement." In the second stage, stakeholders were interviewed to elaborate on the most relevant barriers and facilitators shortlisted from the first stage. The interview mostly focused on the relevance and priority of strategies and factors affecting OeMH intervention implementation. In the interview, the stakeholders' responses to the open survey's questions were further explored. The final checklist included strategies ranked as relevant and feasible and the most relevant facilitators and barriers, which were endorsed during either the survey or the interviews.

resultsIn total, 26 stakeholders completed the web-based survey (response rate=24.8%) and 4 stakeholders participated in individual interviews. The OeMH intervention implementation checklist comprised 28 items, including 9 (32.1%) strategies, 8 (28.6%) barriers, and 11 (39.3%) facilitators. There was widespread agreement between findings from the survey and interviews, the most outstanding exception being the idea of proposing OeMH interventions as benefits for employees.

conclusionsThrough our 2-stage stakeholder consultation, we developed a brief checklist that provides organizations with a guide for the implementation of OeMH interventions. Future research should empirically validate the effectiveness and usefulness of the checklist.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersOccupational HealthChecklistHumansMental HealthSurveys and Questionnairesbarrierchecklistconsultationdigital healtheHealthe–mental healthimplementationinterventionmental healthmHealthmobile healthoccupationalstakeholder consultationstakeholderswell-beingworkplace

Identifiers

PMID38488846
PMCPMC10980995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.