Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38488778›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2024

Accountable Care Organization Leader Perspectives on the Medicare Shared Savings Program: A Qualitative Study.

Dhruv Khullar, William L Schpero, Lawrence P Casalino, Reekarl Pierre, Samuel Carter, Yasin Civelek, Manyao Zhang, Amelia M Bond

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dhruv KhullarDivision of Health Policy and Economics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
William L SchperoDivision of Health Policy and Economics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Lawrence P CasalinoDivision of Health Policy and Economics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Reekarl PierreDivision of Health Policy and Economics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Samuel CarterDivision of Health Policy and Economics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Yasin CivelekDivision of Health Policy and Economics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Manyao ZhangDivision of Health Policy and Economics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Amelia M BondDivision of Health Policy and Economics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Cornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) includes more than 400 accountable care organizations (ACOs) and is among the largest and longest running value-based payment efforts in the US. However, given recent program reforms and other changes in the health care system, the experiences and perspectives of ACO leaders remain incompletely characterized. Objective: To understand the priorities, strategies, and challenges of ACO leaders in MSSP. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this qualitative study, interviews were conducted with leaders of 49 ACOs of differing sizes, leadership structures, and geographies from MSSP between September 29 and December 29, 2022. Participants were asked about their clinical and care management efforts; how they engaged frontline clinicians; the process by which they distributed shared savings and added or removed practices; and other factors that they believed influenced their success or failure in the program. Main Outcomes and Measures: Leader perspectives on major themes related to ACO initiatives, performance improvement, and the recruitment, engagement, and retention of clinicians. Results: Of the 49 ACOs interviewed, 34 were hospital-associated ACOs (69%), 35 were medium or large (>10 000 attributed beneficiaries) (71%), and 17 were rural (35%). The ACOs had a mean (SD) tenure of 8.1 (2.1) years in MSSP. Five major themes emerged: (1) ACO leaders reported a focus on annual wellness visits, coding practices, and care transitions; (2) leaders used both relationship-based and metrics-based strategies to promote clinician engagement; (3) ACOs generally distributed half or more of shared savings to participating practices; (4) ACO recruitment and retention efforts were increasingly influenced by market competition; and (5) some hospital-associated ACOs faced misaligned incentives. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, the ACO leaders reported varied approaches to promoting clinician alignment with ACO goals, an emphasis on increasing annual wellness visits, and new pressures related to growth of other care models. Policymakers hoping to modify or expand the program may wish to incorporate these perspectives into future reforms.

Indexed as

Accountable Care OrganizationsAgedHospitalsHumansIncomeMedicareQualitative ResearchUnited States

Identifiers

PMID38488778
PMCPMC10943415
OpenAlexW4392846205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.